Enhancing Global Competitiveness: Benchmarking Airline Operational Performance in Highly Regulated Environments

Abstract

Enhancing competitiveness in the global airline industry is at the forefront of attention with airlines, government, and the flying public. The seemingly unchecked growth of major airline alliances is heralded as an enhancement to global competition. However, like many mega-conglomerates, mega-airlines will face complications driven by size regardless of the many recitations of enhanced efficiency. Outlined herein is a conceptual model to serve as a decision tool for policy-makers, managers, and consumers of airline services. This model is developed using public data for the United States (U.S.) major airline industry available from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National Transportation Safety Board, and other public and private sector sources. Looking at historical patterns of Airline Quality Rating results provides the basis for establishment of an industry benchmark for the purpose of enhancing airline operational performance. Applications from this example can be applied to the many competitive environments of the global industry and assist policy-makers faced with rapidly changing regulatory challenges.

Southeast Asian Nations’ Regional Competitiveness: An Exploration Through Grey Relational Analysis

“…In the former, competitiveness is regarded as the economic ability and survivability of a company or firm, whereas the latter focuses on exploration and comparison of competition between nations or regions (Guerrero et al, 2016;Onyusheva et al, 2018). Regional competitiveness, or the competitiveness of nations in a region, is studied from a macro-economic perspective (Bowen et al, 2018;Camagni, 2017). Various definitions of competitiveness have emerged, each aiming to describe a nation's or region's competition potential more comprehensively than the others (Bilbao-Terol et al, 2017;Camagni, 2017).…”

The FAA: A Tombstone Agency? Putting the Nickname to the Test

“…The values of coefficient alpha typically range from zero to one; the higher the value, the greater the internal consistency (Spector, 1992). Generally, a value of .6 or higher is acceptable but .8 or higher is preferred (Bowen, Headley, Kane, & Lutte, 1999;Carmines & Zellar, 1979). This research resulted in an alpha of .87.…”

Untitled

“…The values of coefficient alpha typically range from zero to one; the higher the value, the greater the internal consistency (Spector, 1992). Generally, a value of .6 or higher is acceptable but .8 or higher is preferred (Bowen, Headley, Kane, & Lutte, 1999;Carmines & Zellar, 1979). This research resulted in an alpha of .87.…”