“…A number of authors have laid out criteria against which the effectiveness of climate information delivery can be measured. These include saliency, credibility, and legitimacy (Cash et al 2003); usefulness, usability, and credibility (Klink et al 2017); and timely, accurate, credible, salient, and alignment with users' decision-scales (Lemos and Morehouse 2005). Essentially, these all revolve around the same considerations: that information should be tailored to the needs of the user in terms of content, style and presentation and should somehow be legitimised so that the user is confident in using it.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Adaptation Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mattern et al 2018). Tracking site usage through Google Analytics is a straightforward and cost-effective approach commonly used to understand basic usage (Klink et al 2017;Gardiner et al 2019;Palutikof et al 2019a), but it provides little or no indication of users' background, motivation for visiting the site, satisfaction levels, and use made of the accessed information and guidance. However, there are a few published examples of in-depth, structured, longer-term evaluations of the contribution of adaptation platforms.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Adaptation Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newman et al (2017) evaluated 77 decision support systems for natural hazard risk reduction in 101 papers and found that 28 were reportedly used beyond the case study described in the analysed paper. Klink et al (2017) surveyed existing and potential users of their decision support tools for adaptation in agriculture. They found that 85-96% of respondents considered such tools to be relevant to their career and, of these, around half had used a decision support tool with climate information in the past and 94% expressed willingness to use one in the future.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Adaptation Platformsmentioning
“…A number of authors have laid out criteria against which the effectiveness of climate information delivery can be measured. These include saliency, credibility, and legitimacy (Cash et al 2003); usefulness, usability, and credibility (Klink et al 2017); and timely, accurate, credible, salient, and alignment with users' decision-scales (Lemos and Morehouse 2005). Essentially, these all revolve around the same considerations: that information should be tailored to the needs of the user in terms of content, style and presentation and should somehow be legitimised so that the user is confident in using it.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Adaptation Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mattern et al 2018). Tracking site usage through Google Analytics is a straightforward and cost-effective approach commonly used to understand basic usage (Klink et al 2017;Gardiner et al 2019;Palutikof et al 2019a), but it provides little or no indication of users' background, motivation for visiting the site, satisfaction levels, and use made of the accessed information and guidance. However, there are a few published examples of in-depth, structured, longer-term evaluations of the contribution of adaptation platforms.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Adaptation Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newman et al (2017) evaluated 77 decision support systems for natural hazard risk reduction in 101 papers and found that 28 were reportedly used beyond the case study described in the analysed paper. Klink et al (2017) surveyed existing and potential users of their decision support tools for adaptation in agriculture. They found that 85-96% of respondents considered such tools to be relevant to their career and, of these, around half had used a decision support tool with climate information in the past and 94% expressed willingness to use one in the future.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Adaptation Platformsmentioning
“…The practice is critical for interdisciplinary study of climate conditions during conducting complex socio-economic research (Klink et al, 2017). The similar situation appears while governments deal with environmental protection issues in the whole world (Bark et al, 2016).…”
Keywords: Flagship university, innovative science and technology policy, integration, interaction among the authorities, education and business, flagship university functions, university interaction with regional economy.
“…Other non-Russian publications relating to the psychological, environmental, educational, and medical orientation allow us to observe elements of the paradigmatic style of research. This refers either to the ability of the creative team to maintain long-term internal comfort related to the psychological climate (Klink, et al, 2017), or to the use of the modeling of interdisciplinary, cross-sectoral and multilevel integration in medical and environmental studies (Binot et al, 2015). Separately, it is possible to single out publications that reflect the unity of the production of scientific knowledge and interactive learning.…”
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.