Enhancing Intersectional Analyses with Polyvocality: Making and Illustrating the Model

Abstract

Abstract:Since the inception of the intersectionality framework by feminists over three decades ago, scholars have advanced the analysis and subsequent understanding of peoples' social locations, identity constructions, and systems of oppression involving gender, ethnicity, religion, class, and caste, to name a few. Considering these axes of differentiation as mutually constitutive rather than only as individual factors has been the single most important innovation. However, intersectionality has yet to reach its potential theoretically, methodologically, and practically. For instance, the framework is rarely applied to social phenomena that extend beyond the confines of a given nation-state. In previous publications, we have addressed this shortcoming by arguing for applying intersectionality across multiple social scales (intimate, regional, national, and transnational). We have shown how any given person's intersectionality can and often does shift according to the scale of analysis. In this article, we address another important way to strengthen intersectionality-bringing in polyvocality. That is, and drawing upon arguments originally made in postmodern critiques of "writing culture", publications tend to reflect partial and/or limited perspectives, typically those reflecting researchers' privileged, authoritative accounts. In this article, in contrast, we include different insider (ego) and outsider (ego's relatives' and the researchers') perspectives. The article includes the theoretical and methodological argument for adding polyvocality to intersectionality and then applies the proposed model to an ethnographic case. We illustrate how intersectional constellations shift from voiced interpretation to voiced interpretation and, in so doing, deepen, expand, and problematize these same analyses.

Gender, Feminist, and Intersectional Perspectives on Families: A Decade in Review

“…Critical perspectives decenter more privileged, mainstream theories and paradigms by asking questions that uncover differential resources, constraints, oppressions, privileges, and opportunities experienced across and within groups (Osmond, ). We define critical perspectives as those discursive minority discourses that interrogate the social embeddedness and authority of Western intellectual traditions fomented by political, cultural, and social norms that valorize androcentricity, heteronormativity, cisgenderism, and Whiteness over other identities and forms of social order (Collins, ; Combahee River Collective, ; Lorde, ; Thimm, Chaudhuri, & Mahler, ). A critical approach to epistemology, methodology, and praxis is mindful about how the ideas and methods are used, technically and politically, to understand and ameliorate untenable social conditions that are derived from power inequities that disproportionately affect marginalized groups (K. R. Allen, ; Few‐Demo, Lloyd, & Allen, ; Sprague, ).…”

Moving Beyond Text-and-Talk in Qualitative Health Research: Methodological Considerations of Using Multiple Media for Data Collection

“…Depending on epistemological orientation, different approaches to qualitative research will approach multiple sources of data even within the same mode of data collection (e.g., interviews) in different ways. For example, approaches that attempt to get closer from different vantage points to an assumed common “truth” in research differ epistemologically from approaches that see this as ephemeral and that value polyvocality and lack of closure in research (King et al, 2008; Pithouse-Morgan et al, 2014; Thimm et al, 2017). Recently, there has been an interesting discussion on what Loblay et al (2020) refer to as “friction” and its productive uses in research processes.…”

Muslim Mobilities and Gender: An Introduction

“…In their entangled effectiveness, religion and gender influence the degree to which people can be mobile (see, e.g., Werbner 2015; Falah and Nagel 2005). The analytical approach to understanding mobility in this respect is popularly termed the "intersectionality" framework (e.g., Thimm et al 2017;Phoenix and Pattynama 2006;Hooks 2000;Crenshaw 1989). This framework, stemming from the black feminist movements in the US, has become a useful tool for analyzing linkages between social locations, identities and social power structures.…”