2008
DOI: 10.1080/02602930701292795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing learning at doctoral level through the use of reflection?

Abstract: . She has researched and published in the fields of evaluation, assessment and learning and has a diverse range of teaching and learning experience as a secondary teacher, university lecturer, senior policy officer and education consultant.Ingrid Lunt is a Professor of Educational Studies at the University of Oxford. Before that she was Professor of Educational Psychology and Dean of Research Degrees at the Institute of Education, University of London. She has researched and published in the field of professio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over a decade ago now, Raelin (2002; and Van de Ven (2007) maintained that scholarship and 'real life' practice were separated by thinking underpinned by Cartesian logic which should be challenged. This paper argues that scholarly contributions to both theory building and practice development are an essential component of many professional doctorate programmes in the field of management education (Klenowski and Lunt 2008). Taking as its focus the Doctor in Business Administration (hereafter DBA) programme at a higher education institution in the UK (hereafter given the pseudonym SWAN), it is argued that critical reflexivity is key to deepening our understanding of how theory informs practice and practice informs theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over a decade ago now, Raelin (2002; and Van de Ven (2007) maintained that scholarship and 'real life' practice were separated by thinking underpinned by Cartesian logic which should be challenged. This paper argues that scholarly contributions to both theory building and practice development are an essential component of many professional doctorate programmes in the field of management education (Klenowski and Lunt 2008). Taking as its focus the Doctor in Business Administration (hereafter DBA) programme at a higher education institution in the UK (hereafter given the pseudonym SWAN), it is argued that critical reflexivity is key to deepening our understanding of how theory informs practice and practice informs theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper does not seek to articulate how critical reflexivity should be incorporated into or taught on DBA programmes. That undertaking has strong precedents in the work of others (Cunliffe 2004;Klenowski and Lunt 2008). Here the focus is upon the value of critical reflexivity in illuminating a 'scholarship of practice' (Ramsey 2014), specifically in relation to systematic analysis of the DBA student experience and the DBA programme team input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflective portfolios are seen as a useful tool for initiating triggers for reflection and feedback, and linking academic knowledge with clinical practice. 72,84 Learning portfolios make students more aware of their own learning and better able to support their peers' learning. 73(p283) Portfolios have been a useful mechanism in general practice vocational training by bridging knowledge and experience in hospital and general practice, while exploring emotive concerns from the clinical environment.…”
Section: Tools Used In Reflective Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the extensive literature about portfolios is advocacy for the approach or explanations of how to undertake portfolio assessment (Johnston, 2004;Meeus, Van Petegem, & Engels, 2009). There have been calls for systematic longitudinal research into the relationship of course and portfolio design (Pleasants, Johnson, & Trent, 1998) and the impact of portfolio assessment on professional learning (Klenowski, Askew, & Carnell, 2006;Smith & Tillema, 2003), especially the nature and quality of reflection involved (Klenowski & Lunt, 2008;Zeichner & Wray, 2001). This four-year action research project investigating a professional practice portfolio for high stakes assessment attempted to address these issues.…”
Section: E Jonesmentioning
confidence: 96%