2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10951-012-0305-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing local search algorithms for job shops with min-sum objectives by approximate move evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed in [26], no single priority rule performs well across all relevant measures of effectiveness and efficiency. Meta-heuristics, e.g., local search algorithms [27], [28], were developed to solve job-shop scheduling. In [27], a local search algorithm was developed.…”
Section: B Solution Methodologies For Job-shop Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As discussed in [26], no single priority rule performs well across all relevant measures of effectiveness and efficiency. Meta-heuristics, e.g., local search algorithms [27], [28], were developed to solve job-shop scheduling. In [27], a local search algorithm was developed.…”
Section: B Solution Methodologies For Job-shop Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Candidate solutions of each iteration are generated by swapping critical arcs, and a method is developed to efficiently evaluate the candidates. In [28], an approximation function is developed to provide quick estimates for the problem cost, and two methods for sorting candidate solutions are developed, i.e., First Improvement (FI) and Best Improvement (BI). Based on these, two tabu search (TS) algorithms and two iterated local search (ILS) algorithms are developed.…”
Section: B Solution Methodologies For Job-shop Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It identifies jobs or operations that cannot be delayed without immediately deteriorating the objective function value. This principle is most easily applied in the makespan context but also can be extended to sum-based objectives like total tardiness (Braune et al 2013). We use this concept to filter training examples as follows: add only those pairwise comparisons that involve at least one job that is critical in the CP schedule.…”
Section: Example Selection Based On Critical Pathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The due date for an order was set deterministically by adding up the processing times on each processing stage for each job, plus its transport time. The resulting value was then multiplied by a factor of 1.3, which is a common procedure for tardiness job shop scheduling problems (Braune et al 2013). Furthermore, jobs of the same order are not necessarily processed in a row but probably simultaneously on parallel machines.…”
Section: Configuration Of the Instance Scenarios In The Total Tardinementioning
confidence: 99%