2019
DOI: 10.2514/1.j057069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Model Predictability for a Scramjet Using Probabilistic Learning on Manifolds

Abstract: The computational burden of Large-eddy Simulation for reactive flows is exacerbated in the presence of uncertainty in flow conditions or kinetic variables. A comprehensive statistical analysis, with a sufficiently large number of samples, remains elusive. Statistical learning is an approach that allows for extracting more information using fewer samples. Such procedures, if successful, would greatly enhance the predictability of models in the sense of improving exploration and characterization of uncertainty d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research for scramjet with uncertainty quantification (UQ) has been gaining traction in recent years [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Notably, several of these papers have demonstrated the maturing computational methods, as well as standing difficulties, for performing UQ assessment to large-eddy simulations (LES).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research for scramjet with uncertainty quantification (UQ) has been gaining traction in recent years [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Notably, several of these papers have demonstrated the maturing computational methods, as well as standing difficulties, for performing UQ assessment to large-eddy simulations (LES).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once an objective function is defined, a suitable machine learning strategy must be selected such that the supervised machine learning produces a mapping that maps input(s) to output(s) while maximizing the performance metrics defined by an objective (loss) function. This mapping can be generated by classical approaches, such as response surface [22], support vector machine [23], probabilistic learning [24], and neural network [25][26][27]. While different parametrizations of objective functions will affect the training procedure of all different types of supervised machine learning, our numerical experiments will be focusing on the deep neural network , one of the most common technique to generate generic constitutive laws in recent years.…”
Section: Deep Neural Network and Informed Directed Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, err PCA (ν) ≤ 10 −6 . Concerning the nonparametric estimate (see (3)), the values of the parameters defined by equation (8) are s = 0.615, s = 0.525, and s/s = 0.853. The use of equations (14) and (15) yields ε opt = 60 and m opt = 10.…”
Section: Numerical Illustrationmentioning
confidence: 99%