2010
DOI: 10.1080/02589346.2010.492149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Participatory Governance and Fostering Active Citizenship: An Overview of Local and International Best Practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By this, she positions herself as a person who is acting normatively correctly and who is not responsible for the failures in the situation. Thus, in this case, the master narrative is not only about the ideal of an active client but also about an agentive citizen who gives feedback and exerts influence to build a fairer society and to ensure smoother delivery of services (e.g., [ 38 ]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By this, she positions herself as a person who is acting normatively correctly and who is not responsible for the failures in the situation. Thus, in this case, the master narrative is not only about the ideal of an active client but also about an agentive citizen who gives feedback and exerts influence to build a fairer society and to ensure smoother delivery of services (e.g., [ 38 ]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PG initiatives can easily suffer from elite capture (Silver et al 2010), possibly reducing the potential benefits from participation (Murray 2010). Where economic elites dominate, they may gain a disproportionate share of resources; where political brokers dominate, patronage politics and authoritarian criteria can determine resource distribution (Cornwall 2008;Cornwall et al 2008;Dill 2009;Echeverri-Gent 1992;Gray-Molina 2000;Hiskey and Seligson 2003).…”
Section: ) Foster Inclusion By Involving Previously Excluded Groupsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, in practice decision-making virtually rests with these external powers with little or no community involvement. As a result, these two levels of participation have been branded as sham participation Ebrahim, 2003b;Kilby, 2006;Murray et al, 2010;O'Dwyer and Unerman, 2008). In the view of Najam (1996a) In addition, Mulgan (2003) argues that the relationship between NGOs and their beneficiaries is not one of civic entitlement but 'grace and favour' implying that beneficiary participation is only symbolic with little bite.…”
Section: Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%