2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing performance of microbial fuel cell by using graphene supported V2O5-nanorod catalytic cathode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All cathodes showed similar ohmic resistance values because of the same anodic medium and cell configuration, which was in accordance with the previous reports . It should be mentioned that the charge transfer resistance related to the activation energy of electrode, and the resistance reflects the reaction kinetics occurring on the electrode . As can be seen from Table and Figure d, Co/N/C‐900 cathode (8.9±0.8 Ω) showed the lowest charge transfer resistance, which was significantly lower than Co/N/C‐700 cathode (12.7±0.4 Ω), Co/N/C‐800 cathode (15.7±0.5 Ω), and Co/N/C‐1000 cathode (21.7±0.5 Ω).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All cathodes showed similar ohmic resistance values because of the same anodic medium and cell configuration, which was in accordance with the previous reports . It should be mentioned that the charge transfer resistance related to the activation energy of electrode, and the resistance reflects the reaction kinetics occurring on the electrode . As can be seen from Table and Figure d, Co/N/C‐900 cathode (8.9±0.8 Ω) showed the lowest charge transfer resistance, which was significantly lower than Co/N/C‐700 cathode (12.7±0.4 Ω), Co/N/C‐800 cathode (15.7±0.5 Ω), and Co/N/C‐1000 cathode (21.7±0.5 Ω).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The result was attributed to that the high introduction content of graphitic−N could enhance cathode conductivity, accelerate electrons transfer and further reduce the activation energy barrier for ORR. It should be also noted that the lowered charge transfer resistance of cathode can lower the hindrance of charge transport and enhance the kinetic deriving force . Besides, the charge transfer resistance of Co/N/C‐900 cathode was slightly lower than commercial Pt/C cathode (7.5 Ω±0.6), indicating Co/N/C‐900 can represent similar electrochemical performance compared to Pt/C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, when the substrate was added to the reactors, the current generation increased rapidly and then decreased with the days of operation followed by the utilization of CO 2 by the microorganisms present on the cathodic biofilm. This is a typical current production profile of a biological fuel cells as reported in the earlier studies . The MES‐1 could produce high amount of current as compared to the MES‐2, possibly due to following reasons: 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This is a typical current production profile of a biological fuel cells as reported in the earlier studies. [4,46] The MES-1 could produce high amount of current as compared to the MES-2, possibly due to following reasons: 1. Fe x MnO y catalyst decreased the overpotential loss by enhancing charge transfer rate between cathode to microbes 2. the catalyst behaved like pseudo capacitor, which acted as electron sink and therefore enhanced the current generation.…”
Section: Current Generation Profile Of Messmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The charge transfer resistance is related to the activation energy of the cathode. A smaller charge transfer resistance of the cathode indicates a higher kinetic driving force and a lower hindrance to charge transport [48]. Sometimes, cathode materials are coated with catalysts (e.g., Pt, MnO 2 ) to increase the kinetics of oxygen reduction at the electrode surface and reduce the cathodic reaction activation energy [44,49].…”
Section: Effects Of Cathode Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%