Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3025453.3025804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Personal Informatics Through Social Sensemaking

Abstract: Personal informatics practices are increasingly common, with a range of consumer technologies available to support, largely individual, interactions with data (e.g., performance measurement and activity/health monitoring). In this paper, we explore the concept of social sensemaking. In contrast to high-level statistics, we posit that social networking and reciprocal sharing of fine-grained self-tracker data can provide valuable context for individuals in making sense of their data. We present the design of an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the advent of social network platforms and wearable technologies has not only encouraged consumers to reflect themselves but also brought new manifestations of sharing self-details with and learning from others (Gabriels, 2016). QS is becoming a social and shared activity, influencing and shaping reflection on collected data through social interactions (Puussaar, Clear, & Wright, 2017). However, most existing research focus on the individual level, ignoring the social effect of quantification (Crawford, Lingel, & Karppi, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the advent of social network platforms and wearable technologies has not only encouraged consumers to reflect themselves but also brought new manifestations of sharing self-details with and learning from others (Gabriels, 2016). QS is becoming a social and shared activity, influencing and shaping reflection on collected data through social interactions (Puussaar, Clear, & Wright, 2017). However, most existing research focus on the individual level, ignoring the social effect of quantification (Crawford, Lingel, & Karppi, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognising that the proposals and the language used to convey them was illegible, our process of translation seemed to have helped children relate to those issues and proposals leveraging their own, everyday experiences of the world in their own terms [15,36]. Our translation and findings, then, echo other work around data translation that emphasises the importance of making data legible to facilitate sense-making and reflection [3,31] and presenting data in context to make it more meaningful to everyday experience [45]. Beyond just presenting data to children, our process involved them in its production "in-place" [60], generating meaningful data bound up with its physical and social context of what was possible on the ground, desirable to local people and feasible for the local authority to implement.…”
Section: Engaging Children In Political Processes Through Hcimentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Overall, workplaces and employees could organize their digital and well-being agendas around the three frontiers identified by Rapp and colleagues (Rapp et al 2015)-finding new ways for engaging users, going beyond numbers, and exploring understudied categories of users. In line with the sensemaking perspective proposed in the latter part of this article, multidimensional explanations and evaluations of quantification activities and contexts rooted in social embodied experiences are needed Puussaar et al 2017). Otherwise, user engagement with the quantified self will fail to gain further traction, and our insights into its significance and applications will remain limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%