Enhancing Psychotherapy Outcomes by Encouraging Patients to Regularly Self-Monitor, Reflect on, and Share Their Affective Responses Toward Their Therapist: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background The quality of the therapeutic relationship is pivotal in determining psychotherapy outcomes. However, facilitating patients’ self-awareness, reflection on, and sharing of their affective responses toward their therapist remains underexplored as a potential tool for enhancing this relationship and subsequent treatment outcomes. Objective The primary objective of this study is to examine whether and how the patients’ regular self-monitoring and self-reflection (fostered by the systematic compilation of a brief postsession battery) on their affective reactions toward the psychotherapist impact the quality of the therapeutic relationship and treatment outcomes in individual psychotherapy. Secondary objectives are to (1) explore whether and how the characteristics of the patient, the therapist, and the process moderate the effect of regular self-monitoring on the therapeutic relationship and outcomes; (2) examine the relationships between the affective response of the patient, the alliance, and the result of the therapy session outcome; and (3) explore how the affective responses of the patient unfold or change throughout the course of the therapy. Methods We conducted a 1:1 randomized controlled trial of adults in individual psychotherapy versus individual psychotherapy plus self-monitoring. Participants will be enrolled through the web-based recruitment platforms “ResearchMatch” and “Research for Me,” and data will be collected through web-based surveys. Participants in the control group will receive only their regular individual psychotherapy (treatment as usual) and will not complete postsession questionnaires. Participants in the intervention group will continue their regular individual psychotherapy sessions and complete the “in-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire” and the “Rift In-Session Questionnaire” following each therapy session in the 10 weeks of the trial. Additionally, after completion of the postsession battery, they will receive general written feedback encouraging them to discuss their feelings and reflections with their therapist. Participants in both groups will complete a comprehensive psychological assessment at baseline, midtrial (week 5), and end-of-trial (week 10). The primary outcome measure of the trial is the “Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure,” while the secondary outcomes are the “Real Relationship Inventory-Client-Short Form,” the “Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised,” and the number of scheduled therapy sessions that the patient has missed or canceled. Results The trial was approved by the institutional review board of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Recruitment started in September 2023. A total of 475 individuals completed the baseline assessment. Data collection was completed in February 2024. The results are expected to be published in the autumn of 2024. Conclusions This study could reveal key information on how regular self-monitoring and introspection can influence both the therapeutic relationship and treatment outcomes. Findings have the potential to shape interventions, enhance the efficacy of psychotherapeutic sessions, and possibly offer a cost-effective strategy for improving patients’ well-being. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06038747; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06038747 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/55369

Assessing the patient’s affective perception of their psychotherapist: validation of the in-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire

“…Lastly, research is needed to evaluate whether the SPARQ can serve as an efficient tool for routine monitoring and systematic client feedback. Currently, it is being tested in a randomized controlled trial to determine whether its use as part of a brief postsession battery can improve the self-monitoring and reflection of patients about their emotional reactions towards their psychotherapists ( 115 ), with the ultimate goal of determining if such self-monitoring and reflection can lead to improvements in the quality of the therapeutic relationship, specifically in terms of the working alliance and the real relationship, and to improve treatment outcomes.…”