Enhancing Research Training for Counseling Students: Interuniversity Collaborative Research Teams

O’Brien, Karen M.

doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.1995.tb00241.x

Cited by 22 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another clear predictor of both completion prior to internship and progress during internship was the timing of the first graduate school research experience.4. Get students involved with research teams O'Brien (1995). noted the importance to students of working on research teams.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Dissertation while on internship: Obstacles and predictors of progress.

Krieshok¹,

Lopez²,

Somberg³

et al. 2000

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Dissertation while on internship: Obstacles and predictors of progress.

Krieshok¹,

Lopez²,

Somberg³

et al. 2000

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Their establishment -according to (Franco, 2011, pp. [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] -is a strategic decision taken by at least two independent organizations which are willing and able to exchange and/or share resources in order to seek opportunities, the use of which will contribute to achieving mutual benefi ts, impossible to be achieved by each of the co-operators when acting separately. Therefore, cooperation in this sector is a process that occurs when two or more organizations undertake to implement mutually consistent goals.…”

Section: The Concept and Essence Of Inter-university Cooperation: Towmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This opinion is strengthened by (Franco and Hasse, 2015, pp. [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] by their linking cooperation to the interaction in which organizations, while maintaining their independence, strive to achieve complementary or mutually consistent goals. Wilson and Hynes (2008, pp.…”

Section: The Concept and Essence Of Inter-university Cooperation: Towmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cooperative relations between public higher education institutions: the contextual nature of the process of their creation

Pisarska

2019

Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary The aim of this study is to recognize the external conditions for establishing cooperative relations between public higher education institutions. At the same time, these conditions constitute the context in which a cooperative relation is or is not established. The article points out that establishing such relations is intentional. It is the external conditions (context) and benefits of adjusting to them that are of key importance for their creation and, in the long run, foe their maintenance. The study focuses on the possibilities of cooperation between public higher education institutions in the legal form of a federation. The study was based on the results of reviewing the literature and current legal acts regulating the higher education system in Poland.

show abstract

“…Specifically, we tested the independent effect of the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion on graduate students' research self-efficacy and research activity. Given previous findings of the importance of the advisory alliance (Kahn & Schlosser, 2010;Schlosser & Gelso, 2001, 2005Schlosser et al, 2011) and research teams (O'Brien, 1995;Royalty et al, 1986) on students' research development, and evidence of the importance of group cohesion for working groups (Gully et al, 1995), we hypothesized that the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion would be positively related to students' research self-efficacy and research activity (Hypothesis 1).…”

mentioning

confidence: 91%

Different strokes for different folks: Examining additive and complimentary effects of the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion on trainees’ research outcomes.

Kivlighan¹,

Narvaez²,

Carter³

2019

Journal of Counseling Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A primary task of scientific and scientist-practitioner training programs is to assist graduate students in acquiring research skills and, ultimately, developing research and scientific acumen. Informed by Gelso's (1979) model of effective research training environments (RTEs), we assessed the effect of the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion on trainees' research self-efficacy and research activity. With a sample of 76 counseling psychology doctoral trainees nested within 34 advisors, we examined the association between the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion and trainees' research self-efficacy and research activity. Next, we used polynomial regression and response surface analysis to test the additive and complementary effects between the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion on trainees' research self-efficacy and research activity. Univariate analyses indicated that the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion were positively associated with trainees' research self-efficacy and research activity. Moreover, polynomial regression models and response surface analyses indicated an additive effect between the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion on trainees' research self-efficacy and research activity, such that trainees' research self-efficacy and research activity were highest when the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion were consistent and high. Lastly, we found a complementary effect between the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion for trainees' research self-efficacy, meaning research self-efficacy was highest when students perceived either (a) high advisory working alliance and low research team cohesion or (b) low advisory working alliance and high research team cohesion. Training implications and future directions are discussed. Public Significance StatementThis study tested the contribution of the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion to trainees' research self-efficacy and research activity. Results suggest that two complementary components of research training environments are the advisory working alliance and trainee cohesion. Trainers should seek to develop strong advisory alliances and facilitate trainee cohesion to increase trainees' research self-efficacy and research activity.

show abstract

Enhancing Research Training for Counseling Students: Interuniversity Collaborative Research Teams

Abstract: This article presents the development of an interuniversity research team that addressed factors related to research productivity as well as a preliminary evaluation of this innovative method of enhancing research training.

Cited by 22 publications

References 29 publications

Dissertation while on internship: Obstacles and predictors of progress.

Dissertation while on internship: Obstacles and predictors of progress.

Cooperative relations between public higher education institutions: the contextual nature of the process of their creation

Different strokes for different folks: Examining additive and complimentary effects of the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion on trainees’ research outcomes.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About