2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2015.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing satisfaction and sustainable management: Whale watching in the Azores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
1
14

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
37
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, only a few English language articles have applied IPA to researching MWT experiences (Patroni, 2018; Three studies on cetacean and Whale Shark tourism that utilised the IPA technique were able to identify key areas where management needed to be improved. Ziegler et al (2012) used IPA to identify that crowding on a boat tour was a major issue, while Bentz et al (2016) determined management needed to focus on providing more educational information, helping to resolve misleading advertising and reducing both crowding and the cost of tours. The study of Bentz et al (2016) led to the realisation that uncontrolled growth of the Whale Shark tourism industry was a significant issue that required attention and action from the authorities and operators to ensure visitor satisfaction and sustainability of the experience.…”
Section: Ipa In Mwt Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, only a few English language articles have applied IPA to researching MWT experiences (Patroni, 2018; Three studies on cetacean and Whale Shark tourism that utilised the IPA technique were able to identify key areas where management needed to be improved. Ziegler et al (2012) used IPA to identify that crowding on a boat tour was a major issue, while Bentz et al (2016) determined management needed to focus on providing more educational information, helping to resolve misleading advertising and reducing both crowding and the cost of tours. The study of Bentz et al (2016) led to the realisation that uncontrolled growth of the Whale Shark tourism industry was a significant issue that required attention and action from the authorities and operators to ensure visitor satisfaction and sustainability of the experience.…”
Section: Ipa In Mwt Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnson and Lavigne, 1999;Semeniuk et al, 2009;Bentz et al, 2016;Senigaglia et al, 2016;Patroni et al, 2019;Simpson et al, 2019;Walker et al, 2019). Moreover, heavy tourism visitation (Plates 1 and 2), now frequently termed over-tourism, has placed additional pressures on nature-based tourism attractions, posing a risk to sustainability (Bentz et al, 2016;Leung et al, 2018;Capocchi et al, 2019). This has increased pressure on managers and the ecotourism industry to respond, and there are now strongly researched guidelines in regards to tourism and visitor management in regard to wildlife tourism situations (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boley et al (2017) point to IPA as one of the most ubiquitous methodological tools used in tourism research, given its ease of understanding (Martilla and James 1977), simplicity and ability to visualize gaps between perceptions of those involved regarding the importance of an attribute and performance of companies in the destination. In the field of nautical tourism, Ziegler et al (2012) apply IPA to study tourist satisfaction during shark whale -watching on Holbox Island, from a set of specific attributes for this activity, as well as Bentz et al (2016a) in whale watching activities in the Azores.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Crowding and Satisfaction In Whale Watching Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attributes that have a close relationship with tourist satisfaction in cetaceans sighting have been studied previously such as: quantity and behavior of the observed individuals, number of passengers, duration of the trip, characteristics of the boat and dizziness due to sea movement (Orams 2000); minimum impact on marine fauna, learning and contemplation of marine fauna (Shapiro 2006); educational-interpretive component (Lück 2003;Shapiro 2006;Kessler et al 2014;Sitar et al 2017); observation time, swim time, number of people in the water, space available on the boat, sea conditions during the tour, rules to follow and information provided (Filby et al 2015); tour price and friendly environment (Bentz et al 2016a). In addition, Orams (2000), Kessler et al (2014) and García & Pacheco (2017) suggest that satisfaction is not related to the proximity of whales; instead they refer a relationship with the visitor's own safety in terms of keeping a safe distance to whales.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Crowding and Satisfaction In Whale Watching Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A renda gerada e o interesse da comunidade local e de fora na atividade do turismo pode prejudicar a indústria da caça de baleia (HOYT; HVENEGAARD, 2002). Bentz et al (2016a), pesquisando o ponto de vista dos turistas de observação de baleias nos Açores, perceberam que os fatores mais influentes para a satisfação dos turistas foram a concretização da observação de baleia, a quantidade de animais encontrados, o custo da viagem e o tipo de barco.…”
Section: Os Benefícios Do Turismo De Observação De Mamíferos Aquáticosunclassified