2002
DOI: 10.1080/00220970209599508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Self-Efficacy and Learning Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
74
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the measure was also specifically altered to assess self-efficacy beliefs in relation to taking an exam. A similar revised version of the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale was employed by Jackson (2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the measure was also specifically altered to assess self-efficacy beliefs in relation to taking an exam. A similar revised version of the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale was employed by Jackson (2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that self-efficacy is task-specific which means individuals' previous involvements in the tasks help them recognize their level of self-efficacies. Researchers come to an agreement that individuals who notice themselves capable on a given task will perhaps involve more than the time they do not feel themselves capable enough (Pajares, 1996;Jackson, 2002;Ching, 2002;Margolis & McCabe, 2003). Therefore, greater levels of self-efficacy will result in students' determination in tasks in order to overcome problems.…”
Section: Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings augment a convincing argument to suggest that students who believe they will do well are more likely to do well in terms of academic achievement and academic competence. [40][41][42][43][44] This result is an important finding for students, as educationalists need to inculcate innovative teaching practices to allow students to shift in terms of their academic self-concept and self-motivation to allow for change as required. It is further important to consider within group differences such as gender and year of study.…”
Section: © Iamse 2011 Volume 21(2) 148mentioning
confidence: 99%