2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2015.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing the conservation of crop wild relatives in Scotland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, few studies on genetic diversity or taxonomic spatial distribution describe robust methods to ensure the quality of geo-referenced data. Some authors, such as Fielder et al (2015) and Fielder et al (2016) , excluded records dated from before 1970, records lacking both coordinates and location descriptions and records with a precision lower than 4 km 2 . Ramírez-Villegas et al (2010) carried out a process to verify and correct the coordinates using BioGeomancer, Google Earth and highly detailed maps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few studies on genetic diversity or taxonomic spatial distribution describe robust methods to ensure the quality of geo-referenced data. Some authors, such as Fielder et al (2015) and Fielder et al (2016) , excluded records dated from before 1970, records lacking both coordinates and location descriptions and records with a precision lower than 4 km 2 . Ramírez-Villegas et al (2010) carried out a process to verify and correct the coordinates using BioGeomancer, Google Earth and highly detailed maps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the total cost of conservation under the diversity maximising goal was estimated at $9.2k per year across two ecoregions, if this estimate were extrapolated to cover all ten ecoregions in Zambia (upper bound) or five ecoregions (lower bound) then the costs for establishing a national (onfarm) conservation network would range from $41,250 to $82,500 per year 11 . The latter is likely an overestimate since Brown and Briggs (1991) and Fielder et al (2016) note conserving each CWR at a minimum of five different ecoregions should suffice. In any case we suggest this is a relatively modest sum as it only amounts to between 0.5% and 0.9% of income generated by the Zambian Wildlife Authority (Lindsey et al, 2014).…”
Section: National Scale Cwr Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…avoid crossed pollination and they are eradicated to establish organic coffee plantations [104]. The improvement of different varieties that replaced old landraces produced genetic erosion, increased the incidence of pests and diseases due to the lack of genetic diversity within the cucurbit gene pool and abiotic stress [107] [108]. The genetic erosion of chayote is boosted through the inbreeding and usage of cloned plants in orchids increasing the incidence of viruses and fungal plants infected [101].…”
Section: Sechiumedule a Prominent Nucusmentioning
confidence: 99%