2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2014.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing the detection of metamorphic malware using call graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metamorphic malwares mutate and change their codes structure and signatures in each infection that is difficult to detect [1]. Lately, several host-based dynamical analysis techniques were proposed for metamorphic malware detection [2]. However, these techniques require separate environment to analyze malware in order to be able to be detected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metamorphic malwares mutate and change their codes structure and signatures in each infection that is difficult to detect [1]. Lately, several host-based dynamical analysis techniques were proposed for metamorphic malware detection [2]. However, these techniques require separate environment to analyze malware in order to be able to be detected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(c). In the literature, external call graphs have been used for malware detection (Elhadi et al, 2014). In such a case, model graphs and data graphs are compared in order to distinguish call graphs representing benign programs from those based on malware samples (Riesen et al, 2010;Elhadi et al, 2014).…”
Section: Function Call Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They detected malware by decision trees. Elhadi et al [21] proposed a method to build call graphs of programs at runtime and distinguish malware and benign programs by comparing their call graphs with known malware call graphs. Shehata et al [22] presented a detection method based on observing system calls at runtime.…”
Section: Dynamic Analysis-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%