2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2017.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing the detection of small coal structures by seismic diffraction imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current technology is able to detect fault throws with a resolution of 5 m at best although more sophisticated processing can perhaps improve this (Zhou et al 2015). General relationships between throw and fault length (Watterson et al 1996) and between fault length and magnitude (Zoback and Gorelick 2012) of seismic events which occur on a fault suggest that a throw of 5 m would be from a fault of a few hundred metres in length and correspond to a seismic event of the order of ML 1.5, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current technology is able to detect fault throws with a resolution of 5 m at best although more sophisticated processing can perhaps improve this (Zhou et al 2015). General relationships between throw and fault length (Watterson et al 1996) and between fault length and magnitude (Zoback and Gorelick 2012) of seismic events which occur on a fault suggest that a throw of 5 m would be from a fault of a few hundred metres in length and correspond to a seismic event of the order of ML 1.5, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving the resolution of geological information will provide more realistic model scenarios, particularly important for geotechnical challenges and improving stability of underground roofs and walls. Techniques are currently being developed for example to detect faults with less than 1m throw [20,21]. Presence of minerals using remotely sensed data hyperspectral data is used widely for geological characterisation [22].…”
Section: Assessment Of Current Geological Modelling Capabilities Agaimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3(a) shows the raw profile, which is dominated by the direct arrival and has no indication of any reflected guided BHR waves as they are relatively weak compared to the direct waves. To enhance the reflected guided BHR waves, a 7-trace, moving average error filter (Zhou, Hatherly and Sun 2017;Huo et al 2019a) was applied to the raw data, and the filtered result was followed by the application of a 25 ns automatic gain control (AGC). The result is presented in Figure 3(b), where the reflected guided BHR waves from coal seam roof and floor can be easily observed.…”
Section: Geological Model and Corresponding Bhr Profilementioning
confidence: 99%