Enhancing the inclusion of gender and sexually diverse populations in evaluation: Reflections grounded in practice

Abstract

Evaluators are committed to practice that is high quality and conducted ethically. Despite this, gender and sexually diverse populations are not always adequately considered in evaluation practice. Ensuring fuller inclusion of gender and sexually diverse people is required to give effect to human rights obligations and to enable comparatively poorer wellbeing outcomes for these groups to be addressed. Based on our experience conducting evaluation (and research) with both general populations and gender and sexually diverse populations, we suggest a need to build inclusive practice among evaluators. To guide inclusive evaluation practice, we outline three domains for consideration – terminology and language, processes of research inclusion and implications of inclusion. These are not offered as a checklist but as a way to encourage reflexive practice among evaluators. Given evaluators are often concerned with promoting equity and social justice, we are hopeful that actions taken by evaluators can enhance the inclusion of gender and sexually diverse people in evaluation activities and contribute to better wellbeing outcomes for them.

Rainbow health in Aotearoa New Zealand – finally getting the attention it deserves?

“…Te Pae Tata uses the phrase 'Rainbow community'. This notion of a singular community recognises commonalities in experiences of discrimination and 'otherness'; 21 however, an unintentional effect of this is hiding differences between groups (eg between cisgender gay men and transgender men) and within groups (eg younger lesbians and older lesbians).…”

Our Commitment to Promoting Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice in Child Maltreatment

“…We need to truly understand what DEIJ means in terms of prevalence, impacts, prevention, and system involvement. Beyond our present focus on racism, journals can also address gender diversity, sexuality diversity, and neurodiversity (Adams and Neville, 2021; Fletcher-Watson et al, 2021; Heidari et al, 2016). Journals also serve as pathways for career advancement for researchers and scientists through publication and participation as reviewers and editorial board members.…”

Editorial

“…Rather than being a checklist, the three domainsterminology and language, processes of research inclusion and implications of inclusionprovide guidance towards more inclusive and reflexive practice. After all, without the inclusion of gender and sexually diverse people and competence among evaluators to facilitate this, it is likely the identities and values of these stakeholders will remain insufficiently represented in evaluation (Adams & Neville, 2021).The second article in this issue is titled COVID-19 concerns, health services utilisation, and social support among Western Australians with diabetes during the pandemic. Here, authors Olson, Mergelsberg, Jensen, Schofield and Watson sought to understand the impact of COVID-19 on Western Australians with diabetes.…”

“…Rather than being a checklist, the three domainsterminology and language, processes of research inclusion and implications of inclusionprovide guidance towards more inclusive and reflexive practice. After all, without the inclusion of gender and sexually diverse people and competence among evaluators to facilitate this, it is likely the identities and values of these stakeholders will remain insufficiently represented in evaluation (Adams & Neville, 2021).…”