2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-016-0941-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing the inter-fiber bonding properties of cellulosic fibers by increasing different fiber charges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The swelling behavior influenced by the pulping process and yield (Andreasson et al 2003;Forsstrom et al 2005;Stone and Scallan 1967), by drying and rewetting (Stone et al 1968;Wang 2006) and by refining (Bäckström and Haimnar 2010;Laivins and Scallan 1996) have been documented. Further, swelling is influenced by enzymatic treatment (Gil et al 2009;Stock et al 1995), by chemical modification (Chen et al 2013;Racz and Borsa 1997;Scallan 1983;Zhao et al 2016) or by addition of cationic polymers (Aarne et al 2012;Strom and Kunnas 1991). Swelling depends to a certain extent, also, on charge density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The swelling behavior influenced by the pulping process and yield (Andreasson et al 2003;Forsstrom et al 2005;Stone and Scallan 1967), by drying and rewetting (Stone et al 1968;Wang 2006) and by refining (Bäckström and Haimnar 2010;Laivins and Scallan 1996) have been documented. Further, swelling is influenced by enzymatic treatment (Gil et al 2009;Stock et al 1995), by chemical modification (Chen et al 2013;Racz and Borsa 1997;Scallan 1983;Zhao et al 2016) or by addition of cationic polymers (Aarne et al 2012;Strom and Kunnas 1991). Swelling depends to a certain extent, also, on charge density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characterization of fiber charge was obtained following the method of Zhao et al (2016), which is depending on the poly-DADMAC accessibility to cellulose fibers. The determination of the fiber charge has four steps: 1) protonated form of the fibers (or removing the metal ions in the fibers) was prepared by soaking the fibers with overdosed 0.01 M HCL, then the fibers were filtered by using Büchner funnel and washed several times with deionized water until the conductivity of filtrate was below 5 μS/cm; 2) sodium form of the fibers was prepared by soaking the fibers in 10 -3 M NaHCO3 solution, then the fibers were filtered and washed as same as step 1; 3) the fibers in its sodium form were dispersed in two kinds of excess 10 -3 N poly-DADMAC solutions respectively (the poly-DADMAC with Mw of 11 kDa and charge density of 6.05 meq/g was used for the determination of total charge, while the poly-DADMAC with Mw of 260 kDa and charge density of 6.10 meq/g was used for the determination of fiber surface charge); 4) the fibers were filtered and the filtrate was titrated in a MÜTEK particle charge detector (PCD-03, Germany) and 10 -3 N PVSK solution was used for the polyelectrolyte titration.…”
Section: The Total Lignin Content and Fiber Charge Of Different Fibermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blank values were determined by titrating the same volume of 10 -3 N poly-DADMAC solutions; 5) the total and surface charge of the fibers was calculated following the Eq. 1 (Zhao et al 2016),…”
Section: The Total Lignin Content and Fiber Charge Of Different Fibermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations