2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing the stability of organic photovoltaics through machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, OPDs made from NFAs have shown significantly improved stability due to a stable morphology of photoactive later. [ 198 ] Besides, machine‐learning approaches, e.g., kernel ridge regression, [ 199 ] Random Forest regression, [ 200,201 ] decision tree, [ 202,203 ] and sequential minimal optimization regression, [ 204 ] have been demonstrated for predicting efficiency, stability, and significant attributes of devices. The machine‐learning methods can be applied to assist the time‐consuming experimentation and optimization in the development of stable OPDs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, OPDs made from NFAs have shown significantly improved stability due to a stable morphology of photoactive later. [ 198 ] Besides, machine‐learning approaches, e.g., kernel ridge regression, [ 199 ] Random Forest regression, [ 200,201 ] decision tree, [ 202,203 ] and sequential minimal optimization regression, [ 204 ] have been demonstrated for predicting efficiency, stability, and significant attributes of devices. The machine‐learning methods can be applied to assist the time‐consuming experimentation and optimization in the development of stable OPDs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large scaling gap between laboratory cells and commercial modules can be attributed to successive performance loss during fabrication, integration, and installation. [ 43 ] New interdisciplinary and dedicated approaches from other research areas, for example, machine learning, [ 126 ] may shed light on the complex issues related to performance loss during the scaling‐up of OPV fabrication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of the OPV not only comes from various molecular designs including the choice of the donor and acceptor, but also from the device technologies such as chemical synthesis, photocurrent composition, film forming, and photostability. [ 71 ] Although in theory novel materials could be generated through ML models, it is challenging to characterize their synthesizability and experimental process. Hence, some of the latest ML approaches tackle experimental process optimization, and a brief summary ( Table 3 ) in this trend is included in given review.…”
Section: Ml‐assisted Opv Device Optimizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, besides PCE, other device properties like V OC , FF , J SC , and stability [ 80 ] can be also modeled and optimized via ML methods. David et al [ 71 ] used supervised learning in a sequential minimal optimization regression model (SMOreg) training on a dataset containing 1,850 entries of device properties (e.g., substrate type, environmental conditions, light type, temperature, and relative humidity) to predict stability and the initial PCE of OPV devices with r > 0.70. They provide methods for material identifications in terms of improved stability and top performance.…”
Section: Ml‐assisted Opv Device Optimizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%