2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing the vertical resolution of surface georadar data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deconvolution, the common remedy to this problem in seismics, has been shown to be more difficult for GPR data (e.g., Turner, 1994;Irving and Knight, 2003). Two key reasons for this difficulty are dispersion of the emitted waveform and its non-minimum-phase character (Belina et al, 2009). The former causes changes in the shape of the radar wave as it travels through the medium, which makes the task of removing one specific waveform inaccurate.…”
Section: Gpr Data Processing Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Deconvolution, the common remedy to this problem in seismics, has been shown to be more difficult for GPR data (e.g., Turner, 1994;Irving and Knight, 2003). Two key reasons for this difficulty are dispersion of the emitted waveform and its non-minimum-phase character (Belina et al, 2009). The former causes changes in the shape of the radar wave as it travels through the medium, which makes the task of removing one specific waveform inaccurate.…”
Section: Gpr Data Processing Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can lead to non-convergent deconvolution operators. Recently, Xia et al (2004) and Belina et al (2009) successfully tested deconvolution techniques for GPR recordings on low-dispersion soils. Additionally, Spikes et al (2004) used a "spiking deconvolution in RADAN" (S. Arcone, personal communication) for simplifying firn radar profiles.…”
Section: Gpr Data Processing Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For data interpretation, spectral decomposition of GPR data offers the possibility to characterize the subsurface architecture based on analyzing the frequency evolution with time and depth (Bradford and Wu, 2007;Geerdes and Young, 2007). Additionally, time-frequency analysis allows for advanced data processing, e.g., time-varying frequency filtering, inverse Q-filtering, or spectral balancing to enhance the resolution of GPR data (Belina et al, 2009;Economou and Vafidis, 2010;Irving and Knight, 2003). The quality and reliability of such analyses and processing steps depend strongly on the resolution of the selected time-frequency representation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more effective thinking is to decompose the data into signal and noise components, followed by removing the noise and saving the signal (Jeng et al, 2007a(Jeng et al, , 2009Lin and Jeng, 2010). This idea has been implemented by using a number of regular Fourier-based linear filtering algorithms, but most of the methods result in serious mixmode problem and an abundance of spurious harmonics without any physical meaning (Jeng, 1995;Jeng et al, 2007b;Belina et al, 2009). This study is to introduce a data processing scheme by employing a new nonlinear data processing method, EEMD (ensemble empirical mode decomposition), with the technique of logarithmic transform to recover the GPR data signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%