2018
DOI: 10.1111/jan.13867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing validity through cognitive interviewing. A methodological example using the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit Comfort Questionnaire

Abstract: Aims To identify problematic items, assess completeness and user‐friendliness, and undertake modifications to enhance face validity of the newly developed Epilepsy Monitoring Unit Comfort Questionnaire. Design Qualitative‐descriptive cross‐sectional study. Methods Five iterative rounds of cognitive interviewing were conducted with members of the target population between July ‐ November 2017. Think‐aloud technique, verbal probing, and observation were used, to assess how respondents understood and answered que… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the exception of the SMBM, all the scales had been tested on nurses previously. The face, content and construct validity of these instruments used were established prior to data collection through the process of cognitive interviews and a pilot study ( Willis and Artino 2013 , de Vaus 2014 , Egger-Rainer 2019 ). All study instruments had their construct validity established by previous researchers using confirmatory factor analysis and or exploratory factor analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of the SMBM, all the scales had been tested on nurses previously. The face, content and construct validity of these instruments used were established prior to data collection through the process of cognitive interviews and a pilot study ( Willis and Artino 2013 , de Vaus 2014 , Egger-Rainer 2019 ). All study instruments had their construct validity established by previous researchers using confirmatory factor analysis and or exploratory factor analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of cognitive interviewing in the iterative creation and improvement of questionnaires and health promotion materials has been described elsewhere, particularly for exploring how survey questions are understood by research participants and how these require significant contextual adaptation . Results from cognitive interviews often show that some survey questions are appropriately interpreted by respondents, and others show significant differences between what the researchers intended them to measure and what they actually do .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linguistic validation evaluates how participants understand and respond to the instruments and assesses the clarity, intelligibility, appropriateness and cultural relevance of the target language version to the target population (Mear & Giroudet, ). It is strongly recommended as an important and necessary step before psychometric and statistical testing in local contexts (Egger‐Rainer, ; Sousa & Rojjanasrirat, ). In this study, the cognitive interviewing methods, including think‐aloud, verbal probing and vignettes, were used to complete linguistic validation (see Table ) (Nichols & Childs, ; Willis, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%