“…[1][2][3]16,18 However, it is important to note that when applied to immature myocardium, the rate of expansion of cryoablation lesions is similar to RFCA. 19 In addition, cryothermal ablation lesions are associated with minimal endothelial surface disruption and a lesser degree of platelet and the coagulation cascade activation when compared with RFCA. 2,20,21 Preclinical studies have demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of overlying thrombus (30.1% versus 75.8% despite the use of aspirin and heparin), and a lesser thrombus volume with cryothermal ablation compared with RF.…”