2019
DOI: 10.3390/fermentation5030068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enological Repercussions of Non-Saccharomyces Species

Abstract: The bulk of the sugar fermentation in grape juice, in order to produce wine is carried out by yeasts of the genus Saccharomyces, mainly S [...]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These aroma compounds can be defined as “toxic” intercellular communication mechanisms, in contrast to the reduced production of these flavors by a friendly yeast strain. During the last decade or more, many non- Saccharomyces starters in mixed culture fermentation with a strain of Saccharomyces have been studied, usually inoculated in sequential mode, so as to enhance the opportunity of the non- Saccharomyces to influence the winemaking process compared with co-inoculations where its impact can be limited by exclusion or competition with Saccharomyces ( Padilla et al, 2016 ; Aranda, 2019 ; Borren and Tian, 2021 ). In summary, the competitive advantage of Saccharomyces over the majority of non- Saccharomyces yeasts can reside in various stress mechanisms, including nitrogen depletion, sugar transporter adaptations to high osmotic pressure of grape juice (high sugar content) and to a more active proton-pump ATPase adapted to low pH and high ethanol ( Ganucci et al, 2018 ; Palmgren and Morsomme, 2019 ).…”
Section: Friendly Yeasts Cooperate With the Microbial Terroirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These aroma compounds can be defined as “toxic” intercellular communication mechanisms, in contrast to the reduced production of these flavors by a friendly yeast strain. During the last decade or more, many non- Saccharomyces starters in mixed culture fermentation with a strain of Saccharomyces have been studied, usually inoculated in sequential mode, so as to enhance the opportunity of the non- Saccharomyces to influence the winemaking process compared with co-inoculations where its impact can be limited by exclusion or competition with Saccharomyces ( Padilla et al, 2016 ; Aranda, 2019 ; Borren and Tian, 2021 ). In summary, the competitive advantage of Saccharomyces over the majority of non- Saccharomyces yeasts can reside in various stress mechanisms, including nitrogen depletion, sugar transporter adaptations to high osmotic pressure of grape juice (high sugar content) and to a more active proton-pump ATPase adapted to low pH and high ethanol ( Ganucci et al, 2018 ; Palmgren and Morsomme, 2019 ).…”
Section: Friendly Yeasts Cooperate With the Microbial Terroirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Hanseniaspora species are generally related to the increase of almost all acetate esters and some species stabilize the color of wine [19]. Most of non-Saccharomyces yeasts produce small changes in wine composition, while others prevent the addition of chemical compounds [20]. Thus, the main advantage in the use of L. thermotolerans is its inherent production of lactic acid, which avoid the addition of tartaric acid; in the same way, M. pulcherrima possess an antimicrobial effect by the secretion of the natural compound, pulcherrimin [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the early inoculation of yeasts belonging to the heterogeneous group of non-Saccharomyces genera is also becoming a common and innovative practice. Indeed, not only the role of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in winemaking has been re-evaluated for their benefits on the quality and sensory properties of wine (reviewed in [21][22][23][24][25]), but also for the additional advantage they provide for must bioprotection by directly colonizing the environment. Even though these yeasts do not necessarily play a role in sugar fermentation, they contribute to preventing the development of undesired microorganisms [15,16,18].…”
Section: Improving Sustainability In Pre-fermentative Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%