“…In short, when analyzing what the teacher educators say about Minzu teacherhood in the different sets of data, we focus on: (1) How they construct their discourse and (2) how they negotiate the discourse with others (intersubjectivity). Various linguistic elements were used to analyze enunciation: Deictics (markers of person, time, and space such as personal pronouns, adverbs, and verbs), which allow speakers to “stage themselves or make themselves manifest in utterances, or on the other hand may decide to distance themselves from it, leaving no explicit signs of their presence or manifesting their attitude in utterances” (Johansson & Suomela‐Salmi, 2011, p. 94); utterance modalities, which can reveal the attitude of the speaker toward what they are saying (adverbs, shifters, etc.). As far as dialogism is concerned, Roulet (2011, p. 209) tells us that there is constant interplay between multiple voices in discourse and society; any discourse is always associated with former discourses and voices; any discourse is always a reaction to previous discourses and thus enters into dialogue with these discourses; and other persons are, thus, always present in what people say.…”