2011
DOI: 10.1075/hoph.8.05mar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Énonciation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In short, when analyzing what the teacher educators say about Minzu teacherhood in the different sets of data, we focus on: (1) How they construct their discourse and (2) how they negotiate the discourse with others (intersubjectivity). Various linguistic elements were used to analyze enunciation: Deictics (markers of person, time, and space such as personal pronouns, adverbs, and verbs), which allow speakers to “stage themselves or make themselves manifest in utterances, or on the other hand may decide to distance themselves from it, leaving no explicit signs of their presence or manifesting their attitude in utterances” (Johansson & Suomela‐Salmi, 2011, p. 94); utterance modalities, which can reveal the attitude of the speaker toward what they are saying (adverbs, shifters, etc.). As far as dialogism is concerned, Roulet (2011, p. 209) tells us that there is constant interplay between multiple voices in discourse and society; any discourse is always associated with former discourses and voices; any discourse is always a reaction to previous discourses and thus enters into dialogue with these discourses; and other persons are, thus, always present in what people say.…”
Section: Context Of the Study Data Collection And Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, when analyzing what the teacher educators say about Minzu teacherhood in the different sets of data, we focus on: (1) How they construct their discourse and (2) how they negotiate the discourse with others (intersubjectivity). Various linguistic elements were used to analyze enunciation: Deictics (markers of person, time, and space such as personal pronouns, adverbs, and verbs), which allow speakers to “stage themselves or make themselves manifest in utterances, or on the other hand may decide to distance themselves from it, leaving no explicit signs of their presence or manifesting their attitude in utterances” (Johansson & Suomela‐Salmi, 2011, p. 94); utterance modalities, which can reveal the attitude of the speaker toward what they are saying (adverbs, shifters, etc.). As far as dialogism is concerned, Roulet (2011, p. 209) tells us that there is constant interplay between multiple voices in discourse and society; any discourse is always associated with former discourses and voices; any discourse is always a reaction to previous discourses and thus enters into dialogue with these discourses; and other persons are, thus, always present in what people say.…”
Section: Context Of the Study Data Collection And Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polyphony at the utterance level refers to the plurality of voices that takes into account the speaking subject ( sujet parlant ), the locutor ( locuteur ) and the enunciator ( énonciateur ). Johansson and Suomela-Salmi (2011, p. 89) define the terms:[T]he first one is the empirical being in the world producing the utterance, the second is present in the discourse uttering the act and the third is the ‘voice’ that has responsibility over the opinion, the attitude etc. of the utterance.In line with the concept of ‘polyphony’ and the Wittgensteinian notion of the language game, Capone (2016, p. 80) suggests that ‘polyphony is a language game 1 that is embedded in the practice of indirect reporting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%