2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2007.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enquoting voices, accomplishing talk: Uses of be+like in Instant Messaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Various authors (e.g. Crystal 2001, Beißwenger & Storrer 2009) have compared CMC to the spoken and written modes of communication, others have compared specific forms of CMC to the spoken and written modes, for example, email (Yates 1996, Baron 1998, Baron 2003, chat (Schulze 1999, Greenfield & Subrahmanyam 2003, Zitzen & Stein 2004, Al-Sa'di & Hamdan 2005 and IM (Ferrara et al 1991, Voida et al 2002, Tagliamonte & Denis 2008, Jones & Schieffelin 2009). The general consensus seems to be that CMC has features from both spoken and written forms, but that the language is distinct enough from both to be considered as a separate mode of communication.…”
Section: Computer Mediated Communication (Cmc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various authors (e.g. Crystal 2001, Beißwenger & Storrer 2009) have compared CMC to the spoken and written modes of communication, others have compared specific forms of CMC to the spoken and written modes, for example, email (Yates 1996, Baron 1998, Baron 2003, chat (Schulze 1999, Greenfield & Subrahmanyam 2003, Zitzen & Stein 2004, Al-Sa'di & Hamdan 2005 and IM (Ferrara et al 1991, Voida et al 2002, Tagliamonte & Denis 2008, Jones & Schieffelin 2009). The general consensus seems to be that CMC has features from both spoken and written forms, but that the language is distinct enough from both to be considered as a separate mode of communication.…”
Section: Computer Mediated Communication (Cmc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are semiotically different from other types of language use in that they depict, or mimic, rather than describe, the event they refer to. Thus, DRS exhibits particular design features (Holt, 1996) like (a) shift of personal, spatial, and temporal deixis toward the site of the reported talk; (b) prosodic marking; and (c) enquoting devices like she said or like (Fox Tree & Tomlinson, 2008;Jones & Schieffelin, 2009).…”
Section: Design Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are semiotically different from other types of language use in that they depict, or mimic, rather than describe, the event they refer to. Thus, DRS exhibits particular design features (Holt, 1996) like (a) shift of personal, spatial, and temporal deixis toward the site of the reported talk; (b) prosodic marking; and (c) enquoting devices like she said or like (Fox Tree & Tomlinson, 2008;Jones & Schieffelin, 2009).As a selective depiction of another's action, DRS is embedded in narrative. This creates a binding problem (Levinson, 2006) for participants who 4 have to parse the often fast-paced switches between those narrative components grounded in the immediate context and those grounded in the context being recounted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, previous variationist studies have been rather silent regarding the question of how to define internal monologue. Indeed, with few exceptions Buchstaller 2004;Romaine and Lange 1991;Jones and Schieffelin 2009), the variationist sociolinguistic enterprise has not been informed by recent debates in the fields of cognitive and anthropological linguistics about the pragmatic properties of quotes, especially regarding the enquoting of epistemic stance, evidentiality and attitudes (see also Besnier 1993;Clark and Gerrig 1990;Pascual 2002Pascual , 2006.…”
Section: Preliminary Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%