2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2009.10980
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enriched Locally Generated Categories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let CAlg be the category of unital C * -algebras and CCAlg the category of commutative unital C * -algebras. The forgetful functor G : CAlg → Ban preserves limits, isometries and directed colimits (see [8] 6.10). Thus it has a left adjoint F .…”
Section: * -Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let CAlg be the category of unital C * -algebras and CCAlg the category of commutative unital C * -algebras. The forgetful functor G : CAlg → Ban preserves limits, isometries and directed colimits (see [8] 6.10). Thus it has a left adjoint F .…”
Section: * -Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conclude this subsection by considering the relationship between locally α-bounded Vcategories and the M -locally α-generated V -categories of [9]. If (E , M ) is an enriched factorization system on a cocomplete V -category C and α is a regular cardinal, then (E , M ) is said to be αconvenient [9, 4.3] if C is E -cowellpowered and for every α-directed diagram D : I → C 0 of M -morphisms, every colimit cocone for D consists of M -morphisms, and the factorizing morphism from colim D to the vertex of any cocone consisting of M -morphisms itself lies in M .…”
Section: Local Boundedness Versus Local Presentability Of Enriched Ca...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 6 we examine the relationship between the local boundedness of a V -category versus that of its underlying ordinary category. In Section 7 we compare locally bounded V -categories with locally presentable V -categories and the enriched locally generated categories of [9]. In Section 8 we show that locally bounded V -categories satisfy particularly useful adjoint functor and representability theorems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting enriched Lawvere theories from [27] do not fit our aim to do universal algebra over a V-category K. Recently, Bourke and Garner [11] introduced A-pretheories for every small dense subcategory A of K and related them to A-nervous enriched monads on K. Their pretheories perfectly suit our need and describe λ-ary monads on every locally λpresentable V-category K provided that V is locally λ-presentable as a closed category. Indeed, if A is the full subcategory of λ-presentable objects of K the A-pretheory of [11] is given by (X, Y )-ary operations and equations; here X and Y are λ-presentable objects of K. Over Met, we can apply [13] and relate equational theories whose operations have finite metric spaces as arities to monads preserving directed colimits of isometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 3, we show that λ-ary pretheories of [11] can be presented as equational theories over a category K introduced in [31] (motivated by [23]). We show how it can be used to prove the result from [11] that λ-ary pretheories over a locally λpresentable category K correspond to λ-ary monads on K. Then we apply it to the case when K is not locally finitely presentable but only locally finitely generated in the sense of [13], which is the case of metric spaces. In Section 4, we do the enriched case and show that it yields recent results from [2] and [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%