2013
DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2012.717191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enriched or latent cosmopolitanism? Identity negotiations of female international students from Japan in the US

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the participants reported feeling isolated and separate from others during their first year of transition (Oikonomidoy and Williams 2013). For many, their sense of separateness was occasioned by the salience of their heritage identity as differentiating them from the majority group.…”
Section: Intergroup Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the participants reported feeling isolated and separate from others during their first year of transition (Oikonomidoy and Williams 2013). For many, their sense of separateness was occasioned by the salience of their heritage identity as differentiating them from the majority group.…”
Section: Intergroup Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a potential outcome of international students’ education in Western countries, the “intercultural capital” (Oikonomidoy & Williams, 2013, p. 383) is an “expanded consciousness about political, cultural, and economic issues” across national boundaries, leading to inclusiveness towards “new experiences, people, and places.” Likewise, Poteet and Gomez argue that the traditional identity created by the boundary between states is challenged by “increasing mobility and global interconnectedness” (2015, p. 89). As a result, “over time many participants broadened their sense of belonging by their association with other students and through new experiences in the Canadian context” (Poteet & Gomez, 2015, p. 97).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this model, sojourners can choose from four different ways of acculturative adjustment: “assimilation,” choosing the host culture over their own culture; “integration,” remaining both cultures; “separation,” maintaining only their heritage culture; and “marginalization,” discarding both cultures (Yu, 2018, p. 10). Since cosmopolitanism and multiculturalism differently promote “openness to new experiences” (Oikonomidoy & Williams, 2013, p. 383) without abandoning traditional cultural heritage, the notion of integration also represents potential cosmopolitan identity.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of these discuss the experiences of students from around the world coming to English-speaking countries for study (e.g. Ballard and Clanchy 1997;Andrade 2006;Brown 2009;Schweisfurth and Gu 2009;Briguglio and Smith 2012;Oikonomidoy and Williams 2013). A few of these studies focus on the experiences of students travelling from English-speaking countries for the purpose of education (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%