2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2003.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enriched partition-of-unity finite element method for stress intensity factors at crack tips

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is reflected in the literature by the large amount of scientific papers studying edge cracked specimens under load. The most commonly used methods for the numerical investigation of these problems are boundary element methods (or boundary integral equation methods) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], finite element methods [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and mesh independent methods (or partition of unity methods) [21][22][23][24][25]. Equations and geometries similar to those encountered in edge crack problems also appear in other contexts than fracture mechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is reflected in the literature by the large amount of scientific papers studying edge cracked specimens under load. The most commonly used methods for the numerical investigation of these problems are boundary element methods (or boundary integral equation methods) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], finite element methods [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and mesh independent methods (or partition of unity methods) [21][22][23][24][25]. Equations and geometries similar to those encountered in edge crack problems also appear in other contexts than fracture mechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All papers cited above present values of numerically computed stress intensity factors. Four papers present T -stresses [3,12,13,15], three papers present the stress field for an entire specimen [24,25,27], and one paper presents strain energies [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In XFEM, the strains/stresses on both sides of a stress-free crack are fully decoupled, thus superior kinematic properties can be better captured than EFEM [12]. However, at present the main applications of XFEM approach are limited in either in-plane behaviour of structural members (achieved by very fine mesh with high computing cost), or confined to thin shells with assumed full-depth discontinuities within an element [13][14][15] based on regularized displacement discontinuity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method still has some limitations, such as the stress/strain on both sides cannot be evaluated accurately when they are split by discontinuity [12]. For XFEM approach, the enhancement is based on the Partition of Unity (PU) concept, which defines the percentage contribution from the node to a particular position [13]. The approximation 5 and enrichment functions are node-based, so the extra DoF cannot be eliminated at element level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%