2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10606-006-9023-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enriching the Notion of Data Curation in E-Science: Data Managing and Information Infrastructuring in the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network

Abstract: This paper aims to enrich the current understanding of data curation prevalent in e-Science by drawing on an ethnographic study of one of the longest-running efforts at longterm consistent data collection with open data sharing in an environment of interdisciplinary collaboration. In such a context we identify a set of salient characteristics of ecological research and data that shape the data stewardship approach of the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) network. We describe the actual practices through whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
122
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
122
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A further JCSCW contribution explicitly employing an infrastructure perspective investigates data curation practices longitudinally within an e-Science data collection project (Karasti et al 2006). Key to this analysis is the role of standards for terminology (metadata) and the relationship with the different local 'dialects' used by the involved communities of scientists.…”
Section: Initial Work On Information Infrastructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further JCSCW contribution explicitly employing an infrastructure perspective investigates data curation practices longitudinally within an e-Science data collection project (Karasti et al 2006). Key to this analysis is the role of standards for terminology (metadata) and the relationship with the different local 'dialects' used by the involved communities of scientists.…”
Section: Initial Work On Information Infrastructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It involves changing common views and metaphors on infrastructure: from transparency to visibility, from substrate to substance, from short term to long term (Karasti, Baker, & Halkola, 2006;Star & Ruhleder, 1996). Usually perceived as something "just there," ready-at-hand, completely transparent, something upon which something else "runs" or "operates" (a system of railroad tracks upon which rail cars run; a computer network upon which a research lab operates or disseminates data like the WWW), any infrastructure that has been the target topic of activities has probably also been the object of passionate debates -for the engineers in charge of building the railroad system or for the scientists and technologists in charge of developing the network.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These projects share the common feature of using data from ecological monitoring sites (Zöbelboden, Johnsbachtal, Lake Lunz), which are available at a high spatio-temporal resolution. Connected to this data source is a joint challenge of working with big data from the monitoring sites, which has also been described at other LTER monitoring sites [35]. Two of the four projects addressing ecosystem processes integrate a substantial socio-ecological perspective: In CentForCSink, historians cooperate with ecologists to study long-term changes in forest management and their effects on forest carbon sinks [36,37].…”
Section: Long-term Ecological Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Availability of and access to data varies greatly among the three research strands discussed in this paper, resulting from the different types of "data" that each strand works with. In ecological research using monitoring sites, data tend to be overly abundant, and problems are mostly related to managing long-term data [35] and upscaling the data to scales for which other sources, e.g., historical records, are available. Professional management of the large data supplied in the LTER monitoring sites is a major prerequisite in this task.…”
Section: Availability Of and Access To Data And Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%