2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0207(20000820)48:11<1615::aid-nme883>3.0.co;2-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enrichment and coupling of the finite element and meshless methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
153
0
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
153
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Some notable drawbacks of MLS based methods are that the basis functions are not strictly positive and, in addition, they do not posses the Kronecker-Delta property on the boundary of the domain. This requires additional efforts to impose essential boundary conditions [19]. Other meshless schemes where these problems are avoided have been later developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some notable drawbacks of MLS based methods are that the basis functions are not strictly positive and, in addition, they do not posses the Kronecker-Delta property on the boundary of the domain. This requires additional efforts to impose essential boundary conditions [19]. Other meshless schemes where these problems are avoided have been later developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, some strategies have been developed to circumvent this issue [13,15]. Apart from mixing meshless methods and finite elements [16] another alternative to overcome the re-meshing issue in finite elements is to use the eXtended Finite Element Method (X-FEM) based on the partition of unity framework introduced by Babuška and Melenk [17]. Proper enrichment of the finite element basis makes it possible to model crack, material inclusions and holes with non-conforming meshes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An important effort has been dedicated to the coupling of FE and meshless methods in the last years. Most of the literature is devoted to the coupling of FE with EFG or RKPM, see for instance [11][12][13][14][15][16]. However, the attention paid to the development of formulations linking FE with SPH methods is more modest [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%