Pragmatik 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-663-11116-0_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enrichment and Loosening: Complementary Processes in Deriving the Proposition Expressed?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
0
24

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
98
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also various arguments for the view that the meaning of expressions in general, and not only those that have context-sensitive parameters, is usually modulated during online processing (Carston 1997, Recanati 2004. To accommodate these accounts, recent discussions of compositionality suggest that in modeling our linguistic competence we should think of compositionality as the principle that the meaning of token expressions is determined from the contextually saturated and modulated meaning of their constituents (Pagin & Pelletier 2007, Szabó 2010, Recanati 2010.…”
Section: Is Dual Content Compatible With Contextualism?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also various arguments for the view that the meaning of expressions in general, and not only those that have context-sensitive parameters, is usually modulated during online processing (Carston 1997, Recanati 2004. To accommodate these accounts, recent discussions of compositionality suggest that in modeling our linguistic competence we should think of compositionality as the principle that the meaning of token expressions is determined from the contextually saturated and modulated meaning of their constituents (Pagin & Pelletier 2007, Szabó 2010, Recanati 2010.…”
Section: Is Dual Content Compatible With Contextualism?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It gives an interpretation more specific than the literal one; that is, the process of free enrichment outputs a denotation of an expression that is a subset of the initial denotation (Carston, 1997). In relevance theory, this kind of lexical modulation is called "narrowing," and it contributes to explicatures.…”
Section: What Is Saidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decoded content helps to identify the inferences that make the utterance relevant as expected, and is readjusted so as to warrant just those inferences that contribute to the relevance of the utterance as a whole. In particular, the constituent concepts of the explicature are constructed ad hoc, starting from the linguistically encoded concepts, but quite often departing from them so as to optimise the relevance of the overall interpretation (Carston 1997(Carston , 2002Sperber & Wilson 1998a;Wilson & Sperber 2002;Wilson 2003).…”
Section: Lexical Pragmatics: Metaphor Approximation and Narrowingmentioning
confidence: 99%