“…The sequencing methods used were highly variable across the studies ( Table 3 and Supplementary Data 1:T1). Of the studies in this review, 10 indicated that they used one or more forms of NGS sequencing (whole-exome, whole-genome, RNA-seq) and thus were able to sample CH variants broadly (Valentine et al, 2014;Spinella et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2015Zhang et al, , 2018Diets et al, 2018;Diness et al, 2018;Gröbner et al, 2018;Waszak et al, 2018;Maciaszek et al, 2019;Schieffer et al, 2019). Thirteen studies indicated that they used non-NGS methods (Sanger, Direct sequencing, SNP-array, Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification) and were therefore limited in the number of genes and CH variants analyzed (Quesnel et al, 1999;De Rosa et al, 2000;Østergaard et al, 2005;Okkels et al, 2006;Scott et al, 2007;Herkert et al, 2011;Leenen et al, 2011;Chmara et al, 2013;Bakry et al, 2014;Piane et al, 2016;Svojgr et al, 2016;Moriyama et al, 2017;Sharapova et al, 2018).…”