2017
DOI: 10.1101/169342
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enrichment of the HIV reservoir in CD32+ CD4 T cells occurs early in blood and tissue

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In initial experiments using negative selection beads, sorting CD4 T cells into CD32 + and CD32 − fractions revealed an enrichment of HIV DNA in CD32 + cells from individuals who commenced ART during PHI (clinical characteristics in Table S1 in Supplementary Material; sort strategy in Figure S7A in Supplementary Material) ( 41 ). As well as concerns detailed above over the impact of the negative selection beads, we also determined that for individuals with extremely low yields of sorted CD32 + CD3 + CD4 + cells, low cell inputs into the qPCR resulted in over-estimation of both albumin and HIV DNA (Figure S8 in Supplementary Material), which would need to be accounted for when comparing different cell populations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In initial experiments using negative selection beads, sorting CD4 T cells into CD32 + and CD32 − fractions revealed an enrichment of HIV DNA in CD32 + cells from individuals who commenced ART during PHI (clinical characteristics in Table S1 in Supplementary Material; sort strategy in Figure S7A in Supplementary Material) ( 41 ). As well as concerns detailed above over the impact of the negative selection beads, we also determined that for individuals with extremely low yields of sorted CD32 + CD3 + CD4 + cells, low cell inputs into the qPCR resulted in over-estimation of both albumin and HIV DNA (Figure S8 in Supplementary Material), which would need to be accounted for when comparing different cell populations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%