2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5543-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enrichment post-library preparation enhances the sensitivity of high-throughput sequencing-based detection and characterization of viruses from complex samples

Abstract: Background Sequencing-based detection and characterization of viruses in complex samples can suffer from lack of sensitivity due to a variety of factors including, but not limited to, low titer, small genome size, and contribution of host or environmental nucleic acids. Hybridization-based target enrichment is one potential method for increasing the sensitivity of viral detection via high-throughput sequencing. Results This study expands upon two previously developed pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A target enrichment approach (TES) was performed in one pool (F1-3A) to evaluate its usefulness for the detection of gastroenteritis viral agents compared with untargeted metagenomics (UVM) applied in this study. The application of a target enrichment probe-based capture method, prior to sequencing, has been demonstrated to overcome the low sensitivity or the lack of sequencing depth in complex samples with large viral diversity [ 12 , 101 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A target enrichment approach (TES) was performed in one pool (F1-3A) to evaluate its usefulness for the detection of gastroenteritis viral agents compared with untargeted metagenomics (UVM) applied in this study. The application of a target enrichment probe-based capture method, prior to sequencing, has been demonstrated to overcome the low sensitivity or the lack of sequencing depth in complex samples with large viral diversity [ 12 , 101 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HTS would need to be compared with qPCR if it is to become routinely used. The sensitivity of HTS is influenced by genomic size 22 , 23 , as well as genomic structure, and for RNA viruses, the relative efficiencies in reverse transcription and cDNA synthesis 22 . Nevertheless, HTS is virus-sequence independent and can detect all types of virus genomes, including single-stranded/ double-stranded RNA and DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HTS may also be more sensitive than quantitative PCR (qPCR) 19 , 20 ; however the method may be overly sensitive to the detection of background and cross-contaminating viral nucleic acids originating from the laboratory environment or from other sources 21 . Viral genome size can also influence the sensitivity of HTS 22 , 23 as sensitivity is expected to be proportional to the mass ratio of nucleic acids in a given matrix. Although HTS results for adventitious virus testing may differ between laboratories 24 , the development of well-characterized model virus stocks would support standardization and validation of the different HTS platforms 22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of metagenomics next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has enabled the exploration of whole viral nucleic acids within a clinical sample (human virome) in order to detect pathogens not targeted by conventional PCR and to identify emerging viruses [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Several studies have used various mNGS protocols to explore the human virome in diverse clinical samples, including human stools [ 9 , 10 ], blood [ 11 , 12 ], cerebrospinal fluid [ 13 , 14 ], human tissues [ 15 , 16 ], and respiratory tract samples [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%