2012
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EnrichNet: network-based gene set enrichment analysis

Abstract: Motivation: Assessing functional associations between an experimentally derived gene or protein set of interest and a database of known gene/protein sets is a common task in the analysis of large-scale functional genomics data. For this purpose, a frequently used approach is to apply an over-representation-based enrichment analysis. However, this approach has four drawbacks: (i) it can only score functional associations of overlapping gene/proteins sets; (ii) it disregards genes with missing annotations; (iii)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
221
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
221
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical significance was set at an FDRadjusted P value ,5%. Network-based gene set enrichment analyses were also performed by using the EnrichNet tool (34).…”
Section: Functional Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical significance was set at an FDRadjusted P value ,5%. Network-based gene set enrichment analyses were also performed by using the EnrichNet tool (34).…”
Section: Functional Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network topology analyses are often combined with graph-theoretic methods to identify dense communities or clusters of nodes [83,84], or to quantify the similarity between single nodes or node sets using different network-based distance measures [86,[89][90][91]. However, topological properties can also be exploited in other domains, e.g.…”
Section: Network Topology Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological pathway enrichment was determined by comparing transcriptomic data with Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes v77.1 (Kanehisa and Goto, 2000), WikiPathways (Kutmon et al, 2016) and Gene Ontology v1.2 (Ashburner et al, 2000) databases using EnrichNet v1.1 (Glaab et al, 2012), Panther v10.0 (Mi et al, 2013), and WebGestalt (Wang et al, 2013). Only genes above the differential expression significance threshold of log 2 (FC)>1.5 and FDR<0.01 were used in pathway analysis.…”
Section: Pathway Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%