2023
DOI: 10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2023-0240pt
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensaio teórico-metodológico sobre validade da informação da identidade de gênero no monitoramento epidemiológico da violência

Ricardo de Mattos Russo Rafael,
Adriana Costa Gil,
Helena Gonçalves de Souza Santos
et al.

Abstract: RESUMO A inclusão do campo “identidade de gênero” no sistema de vigilância de violências brasileiro, embora tenha representando um avanço, ainda apresenta limitações que podem comprometer a validade dos dados epidemiológicos. As opções de resposta existentes para as identidades das vítimas não abrangem adequadamente a diversidade dessa categoria de análise, resultando em vieses de classificação. Adicionalmente, a ausência de opções para as identidades cisgênero reflete uma abordagem que naturaliza essas identi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, people without a cisgender personality who had not reported their true identity or were not even asked about it, as well as people without a binary personality whose identity could not be recorded, also had an “unknown” record. This scenario especially lowers the sensitivity of the instrument, so in mortality analyses, it is possible that the cisgender data are skewed by miscategorized deaths of others, resulting in a potentially erroneous approximation of the risks among cisgender people and transvestites, transwomen, and transmen (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, people without a cisgender personality who had not reported their true identity or were not even asked about it, as well as people without a binary personality whose identity could not be recorded, also had an “unknown” record. This scenario especially lowers the sensitivity of the instrument, so in mortality analyses, it is possible that the cisgender data are skewed by miscategorized deaths of others, resulting in a potentially erroneous approximation of the risks among cisgender people and transvestites, transwomen, and transmen (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variables such as sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity, which were exposures of interest in this investigation, were synthesized to build analytical groups approximating the realities of exposure of people to the concrete reality. Originally present in SINAN, the possible entries included female (S0) and male (S1) for the variable “sex”; heterosexual (O0), bisexual or homosexual (O1), and “unknown” or “omitted” (O2) for “sexual orientation”; and, for the gender variable, it is important to consider that the registration was made only for travestis and trans women (G1) and trans men (G2), with the interpretation that data “unknown” or “omitted” (G0) referred to the cisgender population, despite the validity problems that this may produce (18).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation