2011
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/729/1/63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensemble Analysis of Open Cluster Transit Surveys: Upper Limits on the Frequency of Short-Period Planets Consistent With the Field

Abstract: Several photometric surveys for short-period transiting giant planets have targeted a number of open clusters, but no convincing detections have been made. Although each individual survey typically targeted an insufficient number of stars to expect a detection assuming the frequency of short-period giant planets found in surveys of field stars, we ask whether the lack of detections from the ensemble of open cluster surveys is inconsistent with expectations from the field planet population. We select a subset o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bramich et al ; Mochejska et al , ; Bramich & Horne ; Burke et al ; Rosvick & Robb ; Montalto et al , ; Miller et al ; Hartman et al ). Nevertheless, these null results from ground based surveys do not yet constrain the planet occurrence rate in open clusters to be lower than that expected from observations in the field (van Saders & Gaudi ). Hence, it would be very interesting to identify a promising candidate cluster where planets are expected to be detected.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Bramich et al ; Mochejska et al , ; Bramich & Horne ; Burke et al ; Rosvick & Robb ; Montalto et al , ; Miller et al ; Hartman et al ). Nevertheless, these null results from ground based surveys do not yet constrain the planet occurrence rate in open clusters to be lower than that expected from observations in the field (van Saders & Gaudi ). Hence, it would be very interesting to identify a promising candidate cluster where planets are expected to be detected.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…We supply the algorithm with all of our determined constraints, including stellar photometry from 2MASS and WISE, contrast curves from high-angular resolution imaging and the light curve from K2. Furthermore, we also extract the photometric light curve from Vanderburg & Johnson (2014), remove the periodic modulations, recover the signal with the Pan-Planets signal detection pipeline (Obermeier et al 2016) and then perform the same analysis. This way, we end up with an independent confirmation based on a different data reduction and signal detection routine.…”
Section: False Positive Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 4, we discuss the uniqueness of the candidate around HD 283869 and explore the path towards confirming the 12 The lack of detections from transit surveys of clusters was not entirely expected (see, e.g. van Saders & Gaudi 2011;Masuda & Winn 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%