SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition 2010
DOI: 10.2118/131453-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensemble Based 4D Seismic History Matching: Integration of Different Levels and Types of Seismic Data

Abstract: One of the challenging issues of using 4D seismic data into reservoir history matching is to compare the measured data to the model data in a consistent way. It is important to decide which kind of seismic data can be best used and at which level of history matching process they can be integrated. In this work, we have performed 4D seismic history matching of a sector model based on a North sea reservoir in the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) framework and have investigated the effects of different types of time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There may be more to gain by further exploring more advanced adaptive inflation methods, as well as localization methods based on streamline simulation, both of which have not been considered in this study. Finally, Fahimuddin et al [13] have compared the use of amplitude and impedance data and found the latter to produce somewhat better results. More research is needed, however, in order to fully understand the observed differences as well as potential benefits of specific types of seismic attributes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There may be more to gain by further exploring more advanced adaptive inflation methods, as well as localization methods based on streamline simulation, both of which have not been considered in this study. Finally, Fahimuddin et al [13] have compared the use of amplitude and impedance data and found the latter to produce somewhat better results. More research is needed, however, in order to fully understand the observed differences as well as potential benefits of specific types of seismic attributes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haverl et al [20] interpreted the GOC depth from single-survey waveform data and assimilated this depth with the EnKF. Most recently, Fahimuddin et al [13] compared the use of amplitude and impedance data with the EnKF on a sector model based on a North Sea reservoir.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the EnKF is computationally efficient only for modest sample size (∼100), which inevitably introduces large sampling errors that requires additional tuning [ Anderson , ] or good sampling strategies [ Evensen , ]. The sampling bias in covariance matrices becomes significant when the number of observations is larger than the ensemble size [ Kepert , ], which is common for assimilating geophysical data [ Fahimuddin et al ., ]. Although remedies like subspace pseudo‐inversion algorithm [ Evensen , ] or sequential version of EnKF [ Houtekamer and Mitchell , ] can reduce the sampling bias, the implementation of EnKF in such cases becomes less efficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of the EnKF to seismic history matching has been studied in both synthetic and real field settings (e.g., Skjervheim et al 2007;Haverl et al 2005;Fahimuddin et al 2010;Leeuwenburgh et al 2011). Although several successes could be reported, different authors have noted that incorporation of very large numbers of data may cause gradual loss of rank in the ensemble, leading to unreliable uncertainty estimates and eventually to filter divergence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%