2010
DOI: 10.1175/2010jcli3453.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensemble Construction and Verification of the Probabilistic ENSO Prediction in the LDEO5 Model

Abstract: El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) retrospective ensemble-based probabilistic predictions were performed for the period of 1856–2003 using the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, version 5 (LDEO5), model. To obtain more reliable and skillful ENSO probabilistic predictions, first, four ensemble construction strategies were investigated: (i) the optimal initial perturbation with singular vector of sea surface temperature anomaly (SSTA), (ii) the realistic high-frequency anomalous winds, (iii) the stochastic optim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spreads of Exp3–6 retain relatively large values and are closer to the RMSE (Figure 12), compared with those of E1∼2. A good ensemble system should show an ensemble spread close to the RMSE [e.g., Cheng et al , 2010]. Thus, Exp3–6 is better than E1∼2, showing the advantage of the inflation method.…”
Section: Validation Of Assimilation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spreads of Exp3–6 retain relatively large values and are closer to the RMSE (Figure 12), compared with those of E1∼2. A good ensemble system should show an ensemble spread close to the RMSE [e.g., Cheng et al , 2010]. Thus, Exp3–6 is better than E1∼2, showing the advantage of the inflation method.…”
Section: Validation Of Assimilation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Dependence of parameter optimization on the parameter inflation factor. Y-axis represents the time averaged ensemble mean RMSE (unit: °C) of prior SST anomaly synoptic-scale atmospheric processes, westerly wind bursts and the Madden-Julian oscillation) of the atmosphere also influences ENSO predictability (e.g., Karspeck et al 2006;Cheng et al 2010), here we mainly focus on the model error. Thus, no stochastic atmospheric forcing (wind) is imposed in ENSO prediction in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, no stochastic atmospheric forcing (wind) is imposed in ENSO prediction in this study. The other is that bias correction of SST anomaly is not performed, which may benefit PO (Cheng et al 2010). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ensemble generation methods are typically implemented with the awareness that ocean perturbations are important, though the effect has mostly been studied for the surface ocean. For example, singular vectors in combination with stochastic optimal wind perturbation (Cheng et al, 2010), perturbing the model coupling physics (Luo et al, 2005) and also the implementation of bred vectors (Cai et al, 2003), have been studied. Beyond two months most techniques showed too little ensemble spread as compared to the forecast error (Vialard et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%