Ensemble fuzzy classifiers design using weighted aggregation criteria

Salgado, Cátia M.; Azevedo, Carlos; Garibaldi, Jonathan M.; Vieira, Susana M.

doi:10.1109/fuzz-ieee.2015.7338110

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The decision criterion to select which models should vote for the final classification consisted on their individual performance, namely their sensitivity. Multimodeling approaches have been used in the literature [26][27][28][29][30][31] and a more comprehensive analysis of multimodeling and ensemble techniques can be found in [32].…”

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

Predicting Intensive Care Unit admission among patients presenting to the emergency department using machine learning and natural language processing

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The risk stratification of patients in the emergency department begins at triage. It is vital to stratify patients early based on their severity, since undertriage can lead to increased morbidity, mortality and costs. Our aim was to present a new approach to assist healthcare professionals at triage in the stratification of patients and in identifying those with higher risk of ICU admission. Adult patients assigned Manchester Triage System (MTS) or Emergency Severity Index (ESI) 1 to 3 from a Portuguese and a United States Emergency Departments were analyzed. Variables routinely collected at triage were used and natural language processing was applied to the patient chief complaint. Stratified random sampling was applied to split the data in train (70%) and test (30%) sets and 10-fold cross validation was performed for model training. Logistic regression, random forests, and a random undersampling boosting algorithm were used. We compared the performance obtained with the reference model-using only triage priorities-with the models using additional variables. For both hospitals, a logistic regression model achieved higher overall performance, yielding areas under the receiver operating characteristic and precision-recall curves of 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.92) and 0.30 (95% CI 0.27-0.33) for the United States hospital and of 0.85 (95% CI 0.83-0.86) and 0.06 (95% CI 0.05-0.07) for the Portuguese hospital. Heart rate, pulse oximetry, respiratory rate and systolic blood pressure were the most important predictors of ICU admission. Compared to the reference models, the models using clinical variables and the chief complaint presented higher recall for patients assigned MTS/ESI 3 and can identify patients assigned MTS/ESI 3 who are at risk for ICU admission.

show abstract