2019 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/tpec.2019.8662174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensemble Kalman Filter based Dynamic State Estimation of PMSG-based Wind Turbine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for large Gaussian noise, the measurement and process noise are considered 2.5 times larger than those of Case 1. This means that the values of Q d and R d in (26) and (27) are multiplied by 2.5. Assumption of Gaussian distribution for process and measurement noise is questionable in practice.…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for large Gaussian noise, the measurement and process noise are considered 2.5 times larger than those of Case 1. This means that the values of Q d and R d in (26) and (27) are multiplied by 2.5. Assumption of Gaussian distribution for process and measurement noise is questionable in practice.…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ning et al [25] proposed a local sequential ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) to improve the estimation accuracy of the dynamic states and the parameters of a multi-machine system using PMU data. In the EnKF, the distribution of the states is represented by a collection of samples, known as ensembles [26]. All the abovementioned Kalman filters assume the joint Gaussian distribution of both measurements and states and apply the Bayesian approach to find the Kalman gain [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23] and [24] use EKF and Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) to estimate the dynamic state of PMSG-WTs, respectively. In these only existing publications on the DSE of PMSG-WTs [23][24], a major limitation is presented: the physical wind generation system model (i.e. the "plant" model in control theory) and the controller model are blended in the estimation process, which results in the following problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) While the physical model of PMSG-WTs is relatively fixed, a variety of control algorithms can be applied, which will drastically change the controller model. Thus, the blended model proposed in [23][24] is not generally applicable to PMSG-WTs with different types of controllers. It should be noted that some existing work already implements the principle of decoupling for wind turbines [25], but only for the mechanical part of the system, and not for the entire electromechanical system and the DSE application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of speed and position estimation methods have been proposed for permanent-magnet synchronous machines (PMSMs) and induction machines (IMs), and recently they were applied successfully to SMPMSGs/DFIGs. The well-known observers in the literature include the following: phase-locked loop (PLL) [13][14][15], model reference adaptive system (MRAS) [16][17][18][19][20][21][22], sliding-mode observers [23][24][25], extended Kalman filter (EKF) [26][27][28], unscented Kalman filter (UKF) [29][30][31], and others. Due to the simplicity, ease of implementation, and direct physical interpretation, MRAS-based observers have received increased interest from researchers and engineers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%