2015 8th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/hsi.2015.7170648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensemble kNN classifiers for human gait recognition based on ground reaction forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may have reduced the variability of the data and in turn simplified the re-ID task (Table IV) [64]. The benchmark for single session re-ID was 97.38 % accuracy on 200 people, an additional 1.36 % compared to our best result on 118 people [65]. Still, this comparison is vague because the authors did not provide a detailed description of the experimental protocol or dataset characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may have reduced the variability of the data and in turn simplified the re-ID task (Table IV) [64]. The benchmark for single session re-ID was 97.38 % accuracy on 200 people, an additional 1.36 % compared to our best result on 118 people [65]. Still, this comparison is vague because the authors did not provide a detailed description of the experimental protocol or dataset characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Kale et al applied a hidden Markov model to human body contours to classify humans [5]. Derltka M and Bogdan M ensembled the kNN classifiers for human gait recognition and reached the 97.3% accuracy [42]. Sharma et al applied the artificial neural networks for gait recognition and compared the performance with BPNN (Back Propagation Neural Network), that ANN performance of the recognition method depends significantly on the quality of the extracted binary silhouettes [43].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While statistical methods including t-test, ANOVA and covariance analysis were used to analyze and test the coupling or grouping across subjects based on statistic measurements for various applications of kinematic and/or physiological data (Park et al, 2017), advanced techniques of functional data analysis and machine learning demonstrated more promising results in regard to high-dimensional multi-variate gait data (Park et al, 2017). In various health related studies, supervised learning methods, such as SVM, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), linear discriminative analysis (LDA), neural network (NN), were employed for predicting or classifying in between of target and control cohorts, and usually combined with dimensionality reduction approaches, such as principle component analysis (PCA) to discover information from a high-dimensional space (Deluzio & Astephen, 2007;Coffey et al, 2011;Fukuchi et al, 2011;Eskofier et al, 2012;Andrade et al, 2013;Phinyomark et al, 2014;Janidarmian et al, 2015;Derlatka & Bogdan, 2015;Tucker et al, 2015;Watari et al, 2016;Phinyomark et al, 2016;Rida et al, 2016). In addition, some researches were focused on modeling motion dynamics of multivariate kinematic data using hidden Markov model (Mannini & Sabatini, 2012) and Bayesian network (Moon & Pavlović, 2008) for gait pattern recognition.…”
Section: Pattern Recognition and Analysis Of Human Motion Datamentioning
confidence: 99%