2021 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (EIT) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/eit51626.2021.9491891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensemble Learning Methods for Anomaly Intrusion Detection System in Smart Grid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A low detection rate and high false alarms are the current issues when employing IDS to detect malicious activities in any field. To improve the smart grid's security and reduce high false alarms, Khoei et al [164] investigate ensemble learning methods, i.e., bagging-based, boosting-based, and stacking-based, over the CIC-DDoS2019 benchmark dataset that contains a lot of DDoS attacks for anomaly IDS. The impact of two different methods of feature selection, namely Pearson's Correlation Coefficient, which computes the strength of the linear relationship between two characteristics whose values are between -1 and 1 and Extra Tree Classifier, which only rates the relevance of characteristics and deletes unnecessary ones from the dataset [165], is investigated.…”
Section: F Smart Grid Forensicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A low detection rate and high false alarms are the current issues when employing IDS to detect malicious activities in any field. To improve the smart grid's security and reduce high false alarms, Khoei et al [164] investigate ensemble learning methods, i.e., bagging-based, boosting-based, and stacking-based, over the CIC-DDoS2019 benchmark dataset that contains a lot of DDoS attacks for anomaly IDS. The impact of two different methods of feature selection, namely Pearson's Correlation Coefficient, which computes the strength of the linear relationship between two characteristics whose values are between -1 and 1 and Extra Tree Classifier, which only rates the relevance of characteristics and deletes unnecessary ones from the dataset [165], is investigated.…”
Section: F Smart Grid Forensicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are instances where traditional machine learning models do not achieve high accuracy, [17] Several ensemble-based techniques have been developed over time, but the most popular are bagging, boosting, stacking generalization, and expert mixture [16].…”
Section: Ensemble Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…computes the trade-off between precision and recall. Mathematically, it is the harmonic mean of precision and recall as shown in Equation (10).…”
Section: P Recision = T P T P + F Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22], [23]. Many state-of-the-VOLUME 4, 2016 [6] KNN, NB, RF, SVM IDS 98.86 ≈ 99.54 (Accuracy) CICDDoS2017 Ullah et al [7] NB, LR, DT, RF IoT 99.99 ≈ 100 (F1-score) IoT Botnet Gohil et al [8] DT, NB, LR, SVM, KNN IDS 97.72 ≈ 99.99 (Accuracy) CICDDoS2019 Alamri et al [9] XGBoost SDN 99.9 (Accuracy) CICDDoS2019 Khoei et al [10] Stacking, Bagging, Boosting Smart Grid 92.2 ≈ 93.4 (Accuracy) CICDDoS2019 Parfenov et al [11] Gradient Boosting IDS 96.8 (F1-score) CICDDoS2019 Parfenov et al [11] CatBoost IDS 96.9 (F1-score) CICDDoS2019 Sanchez et al [12] Random Forest IoT 99.97 (Accuracy) CICDDoS2019 Varghese et al [13] D3 SDN 84.54 (Accuracy) CICDDoS2019 Pontes et al [14] EFC IDS 97.5 (F1-score) CICDDoS2019…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%