2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensemble machine learning paradigms in hydrology: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
148
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 357 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 218 publications
0
148
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…typically combine the forecasts from multiple models and are designed to outweigh any contributing ensemble member. Applications of different types of ensemble AI techniques in hydrology have been recently reviewed by Zounemat-Kermani et al (2021). This study introduces the ensemble GP-SARIMA model in which the prediction process is composed of three main stages (Fig.…”
Section: The Proposed Evolutionary Gp-sarima Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…typically combine the forecasts from multiple models and are designed to outweigh any contributing ensemble member. Applications of different types of ensemble AI techniques in hydrology have been recently reviewed by Zounemat-Kermani et al (2021). This study introduces the ensemble GP-SARIMA model in which the prediction process is composed of three main stages (Fig.…”
Section: The Proposed Evolutionary Gp-sarima Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One key aspect of many subsurface energy applications is a coupled process that involves hydrogeology and geomechanics. Although ML-based data-driven modeling has been increasingly studied for reservoir modeling, most are still limited to uncoupled processes (e.g., Lange and Sippel (2020); Miah (2020)) or relatively homogeneous fields (e.g., Zounemat-Kermani et al (2021); Zhao (2021)). The CcGAN approach proposed in this study demonstrates its capability to handle coupled hydro-mechanical processes with relative RMSE less than 2% of the transient pressure and displacement responses in the worst case.…”
Section: Prediction Accuracy and Geophysical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data-driven models have the advantage of often being naturally suitable to effectively perform uncertainty quantification (e.g., via resampling methods, Friedman et al 2001); in some cases, they are also characterized by a lower number of input parameters to be calibrated (hereafter called hyperparameters). Zounemat-Kermani et al (2021) presented a review on the use of ensemble machine learning in a variety of hydrological applications-including the estimation of suspended sediment transport-reporting that a superiority of ensemble machine learning compared to ordinary learning had been claimed in many literature studies. Bhattacharya et al (2007) used artificial neural networks (ANNs) and model trees (MTs) to predict bed load and total sediment fluxes; they found that the machine-learning approach performed better than several commonly used empirical equations (with ref-erence to a prior compilation of laboratory and field data)-with similar performance for ANNs and MTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%