2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2009.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensemble phase averaged equations for multiphase flows in porous media. Part 1: The bundle-of-tubes model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(15) of [3], where P is an auxiliary pressure in the system, and I is the identity tensor. Except for flows in porous media [7,8], the choice of the auxiliary stress r Ak = ÀPI provides many conveniences in modeling multiphase flows, especially disperse multiphase flows. Although the pressure effect in the first and the second terms on the right hand side can be simplified as Prh k , the momentum equation in form (1) is especially convenient for its numerical implementation in the material point method, as shown in Section 6.2.…”
Section: Materials Point Methods For Multiphase Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(15) of [3], where P is an auxiliary pressure in the system, and I is the identity tensor. Except for flows in porous media [7,8], the choice of the auxiliary stress r Ak = ÀPI provides many conveniences in modeling multiphase flows, especially disperse multiphase flows. Although the pressure effect in the first and the second terms on the right hand side can be simplified as Prh k , the momentum equation in form (1) is especially convenient for its numerical implementation in the material point method, as shown in Section 6.2.…”
Section: Materials Point Methods For Multiphase Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, there are extensive experimental, theoretical, and computational investigations of different properties of multiphase systems, which are directly related to the topology and property of fluid‐fluid interfaces and capillary forces acting on them. Of these studies, we can refer to calculation of effective viscosity in viscous fingering regime [ Koval , 1963; Sorbie et al , 1995], averaging the phase pressures [ Zhang et al , 2007; Nordbotten et al , 2007; Yang et al , 2009; Korteland et al , 2009], scaling of the fingering with dynamic properties of a system [ Tallakstad et al , 2009], crossover behavior from viscous fingering to compact flow or from capillary fingering to viscous fingering [e.g., Wilkinson , 1986; Fernández et al , 1991; Ferer et al , 1993], nonequilibrium relative permeability curves [e.g., Goode and Ramakrishnan , 1993; Tsakiroglou et al , 2003; Theodoropoulou et al , 2005], relaxation time in fluid distribution [e.g., Buyevich , 1995], etc. Many of these issues cannot be explained by classical Darcy's law for multiphase flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of eluting the liquid using another liquid in many arranged in parallel capillary tubes, with different diameters, was also presented by Yang . The author assumed that capillary flow could be described by the Hagen‐Poiseulle equation, which also considers the influence of phase boundary curvature on the flow conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%