2023
DOI: 10.1021/acsagscitech.3c00043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensiling of Invasive Elodea sp., a Novel Aquatic Biomass Feedstock for the Sustainable Biogas Production: Effects of Wheat Straw and Silage Additives on Silage Quality and Methane Production

Daniela Gallegos-Ibanez,
Jesus Jurado-Molina,
Harald Wedwitschka
et al.

Abstract: This study investigates for the first time the invasive Elodea sp. as a novel aquatic biomass feedstock for the production of renewable energy in the form of methane (CH 4 ) via anaerobic digestion (AD). For a commercial AD, to overcome the issue of biomass seasonality and the fact that aquatic biomass exhibits high moistures that complicate storage and hence biomass and CH 4 conservation, we propose the ensiling of Elodea biomass as an effective preservation method that provides a consistent, reliable, and pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The production yields and selectivities of acetate, propionate, butyrate and caproate were significantly different (p < 0.05) after 21 days (Table 2 ), probably due to the different physico-chemical properties of the individual substrates, in particular the contents of the electron donors lactate and ethanol (Table 1 ). Also, the proportion of lignocellulose and thus the accessibility and share of fermentable components such as hemicellulose varied between the different substrates (hemicellulose contents: 4.66%TS [ 34 ], 12.6%TS [ 35 ], 10.78%TS [ 13 ], and 28.3%TS [ 34 ] in Elodea , cassava leaves, sugar beet leaves, and wheat straw, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production yields and selectivities of acetate, propionate, butyrate and caproate were significantly different (p < 0.05) after 21 days (Table 2 ), probably due to the different physico-chemical properties of the individual substrates, in particular the contents of the electron donors lactate and ethanol (Table 1 ). Also, the proportion of lignocellulose and thus the accessibility and share of fermentable components such as hemicellulose varied between the different substrates (hemicellulose contents: 4.66%TS [ 34 ], 12.6%TS [ 35 ], 10.78%TS [ 13 ], and 28.3%TS [ 34 ] in Elodea , cassava leaves, sugar beet leaves, and wheat straw, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%