ENSO and NAO Linkage to Strong Volcanism and Associated Post-Volcanic High-latitude Winter Warming

Abstract

High-latitude winter warming was observed following strong tropical volcanism, which has long been believed to be due to the volcanic-induced positive NAO phase. However, recent works argue that this warming is caused by ENSO variability. Moreover, controversies exist about the sensitivity of ENSO to volcanism. Therefore, to better resolve the controversies related to post-volcanic ENSO and NAO sensitivity and associated high-latitude winter warming, we conducted ENSO-preconditioned volcanic experiments using GFDL-CM2.1 coupled model. Our simulations strongly suggest that the post-eruption Eurasian winter warming is caused by a post-eruption positive NAO phase and not by coexisting ENSO-preconditioned variability. Additionally, we find that the El Niño-preconditioned volcanic eruption enhances the El Niño phase; however, the neutral and La Niña-preconditioned volcanisms do not lead to ENSO–like response. These findings are helpful to better understand volcanic-induced circulation impacts and have important implications for the interpretation of model results and for post-volcanic prediction.

Influence of ENSO and Volcanic Eruptions on Himalayan Jet Latitude

“…Studies based on proxy reconstructions and climate models have shown that El Niño‐like conditions are common in the equatorial Pacific 0–2 years following explosive eruptions (Adams et al., 2003; Dogar et al., 2024; Emile‐Geay et al., 2008; Pausata et al., 2020; Stevenson et al., 2016; Tiger & Ummenhofer, 2023), although models may have a tendency to overestimate this effect (Dee et al., 2020). In CESM1, there is a much higher probability (up to 44%) of El Niño like SSTs in the equatorial Pacific in the second year following tropical eruptions and 1–2 years following northern eruptions (Table S1 in Supporting Information ), relative to non‐eruption years.…”