2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2003.09.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entanglement and nonlocality versus spontaneous emission in two-atom systems

Abstract: We study evolution of entanglement of two two-level atoms in the presence of dissipation caused by spontaneous emission. We find explicit formulas for the amount of entanglement as a function of time, in the case of destruction of the initial entanglement and possible creation of a transient entanglement between atoms. We also discuss how spontaneous emission influences nonlocality of states expressed by violation of Bell -CHSH inequality. It is shown that evolving system very quickly becomes local, even if en… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that many other comparative studies of the concurrence and CHSH violation were limited to some specific classes of two-qubit states usually in a dynamical context [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Arxiv:13066504v2 [Quant-ph] 19 Nov 2013mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that many other comparative studies of the concurrence and CHSH violation were limited to some specific classes of two-qubit states usually in a dynamical context [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Arxiv:13066504v2 [Quant-ph] 19 Nov 2013mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(18). These parameters are the same as those resulting in the maximum REE for a fixed B as given by Eq.…”
Section: Extremality Conditions For Negativity For a Given Chsh Violamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has important consequences for the dynamical behavior of the system. A common environment may entangle initially separable systems, even in the absence of direct interaction [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. This can be easily understood from the fact that the product state |0 |⊗|1 may be expressed as a sum of a singlet and a triplet component:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the states (lower or upper), the classicality condition (10) is satisfied by Eqs. (20) and (21). A quantum constraint should to violates condition (10), such as for example taking both projectors as P = |x ± x ± | , where |x ± = (1/ √ 2)(|+ ± |− ) are the eigenstates of the x-Pauli matrix.…”
Section: A Classical Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%