2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entanglements of marine mammals and seabirds in central California and the north-west coast of the United States 2001–2005

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Intravascular gas bubbles have been found in fresh (Code 2) odontocetes that were by-caught at considerable depth (>100 m) and probably relate to nitrogen off-gassing post mortem from supersaturated tissues as the by-caught carcass returns to the surface (Moore et al 2009). Bubbles may not be seen in Code 2 carcasses which have been by-caught at shallower depths.…”
Section: Physical Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intravascular gas bubbles have been found in fresh (Code 2) odontocetes that were by-caught at considerable depth (>100 m) and probably relate to nitrogen off-gassing post mortem from supersaturated tissues as the by-caught carcass returns to the surface (Moore et al 2009). Bubbles may not be seen in Code 2 carcasses which have been by-caught at shallower depths.…”
Section: Physical Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impacts of debris, such as ingestion, entanglement, and habitat degradation are occurring in every ocean worldwide. Entanglement in marine debris is a major problem for marine fauna, including marine mammals, sea turtles, sea birds, fish, sharks, and crustaceans [4] [5] [6]. Marine debris, such as fishing gear, is particularly problematic for marine animals that breathe air, travel large distances and dive for food.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review also attributed all fishing-related gear events in a North Pacific study (Moore et al 2009) to ALDFG, despite the conclusion by the study authors that "fishing gear involved in entanglements in this study could be either active gear or discarded gear." Two North Pacific studies that focused only on entanglement injuries were also included despite the fact that no gear information was presented by the original sources (Bradford et al, 2009;Neilson et al, 2009).…”
Section: Differentiating Between "Ghost Gear" and Active Gearmentioning
confidence: 82%