Reflektierte Algorithmische Textanalyse 2020
DOI: 10.1515/9783110693973-005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entdecken und Rechtfertigen in den Digital Humanities

Abstract: In diesem Beitrag werde ich die Unterscheidung zwischen Entdeckungs-und Rechtfertigungszusammenhang diskutieren und für die Methodenreflexion in den digitalen Geisteswissenschaften fruchtbar machen. Ziel ist es, eine adäquate Begrifflichkeit zu entwickeln, mit der die komplexen interdisziplinären und kollaborativen Forschungsprozesse analysiert werden können.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On a more operational level, the community of practice approach introduced by Lave and Wenger [212] defines these communities as marked by mutual engagement, a joint enterprise, and a shared repertoire of knowledge and culture [213]. Modes and modalities of the genesis and transformation of scientific insights and "paradigms" [214] are a core topic of the philosophy of science [215,216] and especially in digital humanities numerous articles has investigated their epistemic modes (e.g., [217][218][219]). To investigate an epistemic culture and modes of research for 3D technologies in the humanities, we employed literature reviews as a low standardized method to gain an overview on a specific topic [220,221] in combination with expert opinions gained via group discussions.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a more operational level, the community of practice approach introduced by Lave and Wenger [212] defines these communities as marked by mutual engagement, a joint enterprise, and a shared repertoire of knowledge and culture [213]. Modes and modalities of the genesis and transformation of scientific insights and "paradigms" [214] are a core topic of the philosophy of science [215,216] and especially in digital humanities numerous articles has investigated their epistemic modes (e.g., [217][218][219]). To investigate an epistemic culture and modes of research for 3D technologies in the humanities, we employed literature reviews as a low standardized method to gain an overview on a specific topic [220,221] in combination with expert opinions gained via group discussions.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%